Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1138 Ori
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
LAA No.70 of 2022
Pratima Rajput .... Appellant
Mr. A. Routray, Advocate
-versus-
Manoj Kumar Rajput & others .... Respondents
Mrs. U. Padhi, ASC
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
11.07.2025 Order No.
04. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Though, pursuant to order dated 16.01.2023, notice on limitation was issued to the Respondent Nos.1 to 16 and 20 by Registered Post with A.D., as per the office note, neither A.D. nor the undelivered notice has returned back from Opposite Party Nos.1 to 8 & 12.
3. Accordingly, in view of the judgments of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1989 SC 630 (M/s. Madan & Co. Vs. Wazir Jaivir Chand), in (1999) 7 SCC 510 (K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan & anr.), in (2006) 6 SCC 456 (D. Vinod Shivappa Vs. Nanda Belliappa), in (2007) 6 SCC 555 (C.C. Alivi Haji Vs. Palapetty Muhammed & anr.) and in (2014) 12 SCC 685 (Ajeet Seeds Limited Vs. K. Gopal Krishnaiah), the notice on the said Respondents/Opposite Parties are held to be sufficient.
4. Office is directed to give fresh office note, indicating the reasons shown by the Postal Department in the undelivered notices, which returned from Respondent Nos.9, 10, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, & 20 unserved.
5. The matter be listed next week along with the fresh office note.
(S. K. MISHRA) JUDGE Mona
Location: High Court of Orissa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!