Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2309 Ori
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
LAA No.30 of 2006
Special L.A. Rehabilitation .... Appellant
& Resettlement Officer,
Dhenkanal
Mrs. U. Padhi, ASC
-versus-
Pramoda Panda and others .... Respondents
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
10.01.2025 Order No.
08. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Though notices on limitation were issued to Respondent Nos.1 to 6, all the said notices have returned unserved with postal endorsement "Insufficient Address".
3. On verification of the impugned judgment in L.A. Misc. Case No.72 of 2001, it is found that the addresses of Respondent Nos.1 to 6 furnished in this Appeal is based on the addresses as furnished by the private Respondents, who are the Petitioners before the Court below. Hence, in view of the Judgments of the Supreme Court reported in AIR 1989 SC 630 (M/s. Madan & Co. Vs. Wazir Jaivir Chand), in (1999) 7 SCC 510 (K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan & anr.), in (2006) 6 SCC 456 (D. Vinod Shivappa Vs. Nanda Belliappa), in (2007) 6 SCC 555 (C.C. Alivi Haji Vs. Palapetty Muhammed & anr.) and in (2014) 12 SCC 685 (Ajeet Seeds Limited Vs. K. Gopal Krishnaiah), notices on Respondent Nos.1 to 6 are held to be sufficient.
4. The matter be listed in the week commencing from 27th January, 2025 under the heading "For Orders" for consideration of application for condonation of delay.
(S. K. MISHRA) JUDGE Kanhu
Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack. Date: 11-Jan-2025 12:14:14
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!