Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2289 Ori
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
ABLAPL No.241 of 2025
1) Prafulla Kumar Panigrahi ..... Petitioners
2) Namita Panigrahi Represented By Adv. -
3) Ratikant Panigrahi Byomakesh Tripathy
4) Madhuchhanda Panigrahi
-versus-
State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties
Represented By Adv. -
S.Jena, A.S.C.
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
MOHAPATRA
ORDER
09.01.2025
Order No.
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).
2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records.
3. This is an application under Section 482, B.N.S.S. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail.
4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that no F.I.R. has been registered as of now.
5. Considering the aforesaid facts, there is no apprehension of arrest against the Petitioners.
While disposing of the application, this Court directs the Arresting Officer shall first explore the possibility of the applying
the principles of Section 35 (3), (4), (5) of B.N.S.S. in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in AIR 2014 SC 2756, in the event any F.I.R. is likely to be registered which comes within the purview of the aforesaid judgment as well as the provisions of Section 35(3), (4), (5) of B.N.S.S.
6. In such view of the matter, the ABLAPL is disposed of.
( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil
Location: High Court of Orissa
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!