Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

) Prafulla Kumar Panigrahi vs State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties
2025 Latest Caselaw 2289 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 2289 Ori
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2025

Orissa High Court

) Prafulla Kumar Panigrahi vs State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties on 9 January, 2025

Author: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                               ABLAPL No.241 of 2025
            1) Prafulla Kumar Panigrahi     .....    Petitioners
            2) Namita Panigrahi                             Represented By Adv. -
            3) Ratikant Panigrahi                           Byomakesh Tripathy
            4) Madhuchhanda Panigrahi

                                            -versus-
            State Of Odisha                        .....        Opposite Parties
                                                           Represented By Adv. -
                                                           S.Jena, A.S.C.

                                  CORAM:
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
                                MOHAPATRA

                                           ORDER

09.01.2025

Order No.

01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners, learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State. Perused the records.

3. This is an application under Section 482, B.N.S.S. filed by the Petitioners for anticipatory bail.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submitted that no F.I.R. has been registered as of now.

5. Considering the aforesaid facts, there is no apprehension of arrest against the Petitioners.

While disposing of the application, this Court directs the Arresting Officer shall first explore the possibility of the applying

the principles of Section 35 (3), (4), (5) of B.N.S.S. in the case of Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar reported in AIR 2014 SC 2756, in the event any F.I.R. is likely to be registered which comes within the purview of the aforesaid judgment as well as the provisions of Section 35(3), (4), (5) of B.N.S.S.

6. In such view of the matter, the ABLAPL is disposed of.

( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil

Location: High Court of Orissa

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter