Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 11696 Ori
Judgement Date : 24 December, 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
EXP No. 02 of 2021
SEPCO Electric Power Construction
Corporation ........ Petitioner (s)
Mr. S.K. Kachwaha, Adv.
Mr. Swayam Satyakam, Adv.
-Versus-
GMR Kamalanga Energy Ltd. ....... Opposite Party(s)
Ms. Pami Rath, Sr. Adv.
along with associate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI
ORDER
24.12.2025 Order No.
02.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. This Execution Petition has been filed by the Petitioner seeking
execution of the Arbitral Award dated 07.09.2020 as corrected on
7th September, 2020 and final award dated 24th June, 2021 as
corrected on 1st September, 2021.
4. Learned counsel for the Appellant Mr. Kachwaha submits that
the arbitral awards had been passed in an arbitration proceeding
commenced in respect of the disputes which had arisen between
the parties in relation to the construction of a coal fired thermal
power plant of 1050 MW (3 x 350MW) at Kamalanga village,
Dhenkanal District, State of Odisha. He further submits that the
Respondent had challenged the Main Award under Section 34 of
the Arbitration Act before this Court, which was registered as
ARBP (ICA) No.l of 2021 and the same was dismissed vide
judgment dated 17th June, 2022.
5. Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent Ms. Rath submits
that being aggrieved by the said judgment, the Respondent had
filed a Special Leave petition vide SLP(C) No.12194 of 2022 before
the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court vide order dated 15th
May, 2023 allowed the Respondent to approach this Court by
way of an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act against
the judgment dated 17th June, 2022. Therefore, the Respondent
filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act before this
Court vide ARBA (ICA) No.1 of 2023. He further submits that the
Division Bench of this Court has allowed the Appeal filed under
Section 37 of the Arbitration Act by the Respondent and set aside
the Judgment passed under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and
the main award.
6. Learned counsel for the Respondent further contends that being
aggrieved by the Judgment passed under Section 37 of the
Arbitration Act, the Appellant had filed a Special Leave petition
before the Supreme Court of India vide SLP(C) No.2706 of 2024
and the said SLP(C) has been dismissed upholding the judgment
passed under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act and setting aside
the main award as well as the judgment passed under Section 34
of the Arbitration Act. Hence, the Execution Petition is not
maintainable and ought to be dismissed.
7. In such view of the above, this Court is of the view that this
Petition is not maintainable.
8. Accordingly, the Execution Petition is disposed of.
( Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Murmu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!