Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Satyanarayan Kaudi vs ) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties
2025 Latest Caselaw 7067 Ori

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7067 Ori
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2025

Orissa High Court

Satyanarayan Kaudi vs ) State Of Odisha ..... Opposite Parties on 15 April, 2025

Author: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
Bench: Aditya Kumar Mohapatra
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                               WP(C) No.10090 of 2025
            Satyanarayan Kaudi                .....   Petitioner
                                                                    Represented By Adv. -
                                                                    Laxmikanta Mohanty

                                                 -versus-
            1) State Of Odisha                              .....      Opposite Parties
            2) Collector And Dist.magistrate,                       Represented By Adv. -
            Sambalpur                                               Mr.U.C.Behura,AGA
            3) Sub Collector, Kuchinda
            4) Tahasildar Of Rairakhol Tahasil

                                   CORAM:
                     THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR
                                 MOHAPATRA

                                                    ORDER

Order No. 15.04.2025

01 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Advocate. Perused the Writ Petition and the documents annexed thereto.

3. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the Petitioner that during pendency of criminal trial, filing of defence by the Petitioner in the disciplinary proceeding will jeopardize the prospect of the delinquent-Petitioner involved in the criminal case, this Court finds support for the submission of learned counsel for the Petitioner in the aforesaid context from the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in AIR 1999 SC 1416, decided taking support of the old decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court reported in AIR 1965 SC 155. Similar

view has also been taken in a judgment reported in (2012) 1 SCC 442.

4. By filing the present Writ Petition, the Petitioner has prayed for stay of the Disciplinary Proceeding No.3368 dated 03.04.2023 under Annexure-3 involving the Petitioner till finalisation of the Criminal trial vide Sambalpur Vigilance P.S.Case No.5 dated 15.02.1993 pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge (Vigilance), Sambalpur.

5. Learned counsel for the State draws the attention of this Court to the Charges framed by criminal court and in the Disciplinary Proceeding and contends that the disciplinary proceeding has been initiated against the Petitioner for suppression of information regarding his involvement in criminal case and, as such, the charges in both the cases are different. Therefore, he submits that the ratio decided in the aforesaid Supreme Court judgments are not applicable to the facts of the present case and the disciplinary proceeding against the Petitioner should not be stayed awaiting the verdict in criminal case and further prays for dismissal of the Writ Petition.

6. This Court on a careful scrutiny of the charges in both proceeding partly agrees with the submission made by Mr.Behura, earned AGA. The charges in criminal case no doubt forms the basis for the initiation of D.P. in addition to the charge that such information was not disclosed to the employer by the employee in violation of the service rules. However, this Court is also of the view that while continuing with the D.P., the Petitioner would be required to disclose his

defence which might be detrimental to his interest involved in the criminal trial.

7. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and upon a careful analysis of the rival contentions and upon a scrutiny of the Writ Petition ad the documents attached to it, this Court in the greater interest of justice deems it proper to dispose of the Writ Petition by directing that the Disciplinary Proceeding against the Petitioner shall remain stayed for a r of one year from the date of this order. Further, on production of a certified copy of this order by the Petitioner, the Court in seisin over the trial of the case arising out of Sambalpur vigilance P.S.Case No.05 dated 15.02.2023 under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(b)/12 of the P.C.Act shall expedite the trial and make every endeavour to conclude the trial within one year. Parties are directed to cooperate with the trial court.

8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Application is disposed of.

Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.



                                                       ( A.K. Mohapatra )
                                                              Judge
RKS





 Digitally Signed                                                       Page 3 of 3.

 Designation: AR-CUM-Senior Secretary
 Reason: Authentication
 Location: High Court of Orissa
 Date: 16-Apr-2025 17:18:20
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter