Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 16583 Ori
Judgement Date : 12 November, 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RVWPET No.248 of 2019
State of Odisha & others .... Petitioners
Mr. Tej Kumar, ASC
-versus-
Chakradhar Mohaud & .... Opp. Parties
others
Mr. Sushanta Kumar Mishra,
Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE SIBO SANKAR MISHRA
Order ORDER
No. 12.11.2024
02. 1. Heard Mr. Tej Kumar, learned Additional Standing
Counsel for the State/petitioners and Mr. Sushanta Kumar
Mishra, learned counsel for the opposite parties.
2. In this review petition, the petitioners are aggrieved
by the order dated 14.03.2018 passed by the learned Single
Bench of this Court in Misc. Case No.287 of 2016 arising
out of FAO No.147 of 2016.
3. The aforementioned first Appeal, a Misc. Case was
filed by the State for condonation of delay in filing the First
Appeal, which has been rejected. The learned Single
Judge, who was not satisfied on the cause shown to
explain the delay of 732 days has dismissed the
condonation of delay application relying upon the
judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Page 1 of 3
Office of the Chief Post Master & Others vrs. Living
Media India Ltd. & Another, reported in (2012) 3 SCC
563, as a sequel to that, the FAO failed and was
dismissed. Against the said order, the petitioners have filed
the present review petition relying upon the order dated
1.
9.2017 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.11180-81 of 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in similar circumstances has condoned the delay and passed the following order:
"Delay condoned.
Leave granted.
Having regard to the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case we, condone the delay in filing the appeal before the High Court. Accordingly, we set aside the impugned order of the High Court and remand the matter to the High Court for fresh decision in accordance with law. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of. Parties are directed to appear before the High Court for further proceedings on October 9, 2017."
4. The condonation of delay and allowing the appeal to be heard by the High Court passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is based on the facts of that case and the petitioners are not able to convince this Court regarding the number of days delay in those cases in which the Hon'ble Supreme Court had given indulgence. Moreover, the sufficient cause to be shown to explain the delay being a pure question of fact, which was dealt with by the Learn Single Judge in the impugned order, the same is not open to Review Jurisdiction for re-appreciation. I am not convinced by
the argument put forth by the learned counsel for the petitioners.
5. Hence, the Review Petition fails and accordingly the same is dismissed.
(S.S. Mishra) Judge
amit
Location: HIGH COURT OF ORSSA, CUTTACK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!