Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sania Pradhan @ Sanyasi Pradhan vs State Of Odisha & Ors. .... Opposite ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10509 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10509 Ori
Judgement Date : 25 June, 2024

Orissa High Court

Sania Pradhan @ Sanyasi Pradhan vs State Of Odisha & Ors. .... Opposite ... on 25 June, 2024

Author: S.K. Panigrahi

Bench: S.K. Panigrahi

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                              W.P.(C) No.12427 of 2017
                     (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the
                     Constitution of India, 1950).

                    Sania Pradhan @ Sanyasi Pradhan ....                          Petitioner(s)
                    & Anr.
                                               -versus-
                    State of Odisha & Ors.              ....                Opposite Party (s)

                    Advocates appeared in the case through Hybrid Mode:
                    For Petitioner(s)       :              Mr. Biswajit Moharana, Adv.


                    For Opposite Party (s)        :                 Mr. Sonak Mishra, A.S.C.

                                   CORAM:
                                   DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

                                        DATE OF HEARING:-15.04.2024
                                       DATE OF JUDGMENT: -25.06.2024
                  Dr. S.K. Panigrahi, J.

1. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioners seek a direction from this Court to

the Opposite Parties/ State to pay an amount of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees

Five Lakh only) towards compensation for death of their son Kunal

Pradhan inside the campus of Project Upper Primary School, Ranikiari

in the district of Ganjam due to falling of latrine wall of the school.

I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE:

2. The brief fact of the case as presented by the Parties during the course of

argument and on the basis of material placed on record:

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK

(i) The Petitioner No.1 is a farmer and Petitioner No.2 is the wife of the

Petitioner No.1. They blessed with a son named Kunal Pradhan, who

was studying in Class-II in the Project Upper Primary School, Ranikiari

of the district of Ganjam.

(ii) The son of the Petitioners had attended the School on 24.09.2016. After

the School Classes were over he was playing with his friends inside the

School premises. All of a sudden, the old latrine wall of the School fell

down on him and he was trapped under the collapsed wall. As a result,

he sustained severe injury on his head and body. After hearing the

same, the Petitioner No.2 rushed to the School and shifted him to

Bhanjanagar Hospital for his treatment. Due to his critical condition, he

was referred to M.K.C.G. Medical College and Hospital, Berhampur.

But, the son of the Petitioners died on the way to Berhampur. The

doctor declared him dead.

(iii) The Petitioner No.1 had reported the same before the I.I.C., Tarasing

Police Station. The same was registered as Tarasing P.S. Case No.4 of

2016. Pursuant to the direction of the I.I.C., Tarasingh Police Station, the

I.O. held the inquest over the dead body of the deceased and post-

mortem was conducted by the Doctor.

(iv) The I.O. filed final report before the learned S.D.J.M., Bhanjanagar on

26.09.2016 declaring that the death of deceased Kunal Pradhan was due

to falling of wall inside the School campus of the Project Upper Primary

School, Ranikiari.

(v) After death of their son, the Petitioners approached the Opposite Party

No.4/ District Education Officer, Ganjam through the Opposite Party

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35 No.5/ Headmaster, P.U.P. School, Ranikiari and Block Education

Officer, Bhanjanager for payment of compensation on 18.11.2016.

(vi) However, the Opposite Parties/State are not disbursing compensation

with a plea that the Notification dated 01.06.2016 of the Department of

Revenue and Disaster Management, Government of Odisha does not

stipulate for payment of compensation for death due to falling of wall.

(vii) Therefore, the Petitioners are constrained to approach this Court with a

prayer to direct the Opposite Parties to pay compensation of

Rs.5,00,000/ (Rupees Five Lakh only) to them.

II. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONERS:

3. Learned counsel for the Petitioners earnestly made the following

submissions in support of his contentions.

(i) The son of the Petitioners died due to gross negligence of the State

authorities for not maintaining the School structure properly. As such

an unfortunate incident has occurred due to dereliction of the State

authorities, the State authorities should have acted promptly to provide

adequate compensation to the unfortunate parents who lost their only

son forever.

(ii) The negligence on the part of the Opposite Parties/State to repair the

latrine wall or demolish the same. As it is the duty of the State

administration to ensure the safety of the students and they have failed

to maintain the safety of the School building, they are negligent in

performing their duties for which they are bound to pay compensation

to the Petitioners.

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35

(iii) It is the duty and responsibility of the State to provide basic and safe

infrastructure in the Primary Schools in order to prevent any untoward

incident like the present one. It is also the duty of the State to repair the

damaged school building or walls. Due to such negligence and

callousness attitude of the State administration, a tender life has met

with tragic end.

(iv) Non-payment of compensation to the Petitioners by the Opposite

Parties/ State is illegal and in gross violation of Article 14 of the

Constitution of India.

(v) Reliance has also been placed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner

on the judgment dated 30.01.2024 passed by the learned Division Bench

of this Court in W.A. No.1677 of 2022, whereby the order dated

18.10.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.16845 of

2012 has been confirmed awarding compensation of Rs.10,00,000/-(Ten

Lakhs) due to premature death of a child who was pursuing his studies

at Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, Konark in an untoward incident

occurred while he was playing cricket due to hitting of a cricket bat. In

the said Writ Appeal, the learned Division Bench has taken into account

the judgment dated 13.12.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.(C)

No.21267 of 2014 wherein plethora of judicial pronouncements have

been referred to in order to decide the issue i.e. "whether the

respondent is entitled to compensation or not and under what

circumstances compensation can be awarded".

(vi) In such view of the matter, he submits that the Opposite Parties/ State

may be directed to pay compensation of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35 only) to the Petitioners within a stipulated period for death of their son

Kunal Pradhan.

III. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE OPPOSITE PARTY NO.4/

STATE:

4. In reply, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.4/ State earnestly

made the following submissions in support of his contentions:

(i) Kunal Pradhan son of the Petitioners a student of Class-III of Project

Upper Primary School, Ranikiari under Bhanjanagar Block died being

injured in the school premises while playing and swing on the door of

an old toilet building wall which collapsed and caused serious injury to

the child. Thereafter, initially he was admitted in the Bhanjanagar Sub-

Divisional Medical Centre for treatment. But, due to his critical

condition, he was referred to M.K.C.G. Medical College and Hospital,

Berhampur. While he was taken to Berhampur, the said child Kunal

Pradhan died on the way on 24.09.2016.

(ii) After the death of the son of the Petitioners, the Headmaster, Project

Upper Primary School, Ranikiari submitted a proposal to the Block

Education Officer, Bhanjanagar for sanction of ex-gratia grant vide his

letter No.187 dated 18.11.2016 which has been forwarded to the

Opposite Party No.4/ District Education Officer, Ganjam, Berhampur

vide letter No.2220 dated 22.12.2016 of Block Education Officer,

Bhanjanagar.

(iii) After due inquiry, the Opposite Party No.3/ Collector and District

Magistrate, Ganjam has sanctioned a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two

Signature NotLakhs) only for payment of ex- gratia grant in favour of Smt. Runu Verified

Signed by: BHABAGRAHI JHANKAR Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35 Pradhan mother of Late Kunal Pradhan towards accidental relief for

students from Students Welfare Fund as per Government Notification

No.V- SME(P)-12/2015-6224, dated 25.03.2015 issued by the School and

Mass Education Department, Odisha. Bhubaneswar. The payment shall

be made on receipt of allotment from the Director, Secondary

Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar.

(iv) After sanction of the ex-gratia grant by the Opposite Party No.3/

Collector and District Magistrate, Ganjam, the Opposite Party No.4/

District Education Officer, Ganjam, Berhampur has submitted the

proposal to the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar

for placement of allotment of Rs.2,00,000/- for payment of ex-gratia

grant in favour of Smt. Runu Pradhan vide letter No.7717 dated

18.08.2017.

(v) All possible steps have been taken by the Opposite Party No.4/ State for

payment of ex-gratia grant in favour of the mother of the deceased

child. Soon after receipt of the allotment from the Director, Secondary

Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar steps for payment of ex- gratia grant

will be taken.

(vi) In such premises, it was contended that the claim of the Petitioners for

payment of Rs.5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakh only) towards

compensation deserves no merit for consideration and the prayer of the

Petitioners is liable to be dismissed.

          IV.     COURT'S REASONING AND ANALYSIS:







Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK
Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35

5. Perused the materials available on records and considered the rival

submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the

learned counsel for the State.

6. Admittedly, eight year old boy named Kunal Pradhan, who was the

only son of the Petitioners, died inside the campus of the Project Upper

Primary School, Ranikiari in the district of Ganjam by falling of an old

toilet wall of the School. Initially, he was admitted in Bhanjanagar Sub-

Divisional Medical Centre for treatment. But, due to his critical

condition, he was referred to M.K.C.G. Medical College and Hospital,

Berhampur. On the way to Berhampur, the deceased child Kunal

Pradhan died on 24.09.2016.

7. Thus, it is evident that the collapse of the toilet building wall on the

fateful day was due to sheer negligence on the part of the Opposite

Parties/ State, who are duty bound to maintain the Project Upper

Primary School, Ranikiari building and its surrounding in a proper

manner. The safety of the children cannot be taken so lightly by the

School authority.

8. It is contended by the Opposite Party No.4/ State that all possible steps

have been taken for payment of ex-gratia grant in favour of the mother

of the deceased child. Soon after receipt of the allotment from the

Director, Secondary Education, Odisha, Bhubaneswar steps for

payment of ex- gratia grant would be taken. No amount of

compensation could wipe out the tear of the parents, yet the

Department has realized that it has done a lien of a benevolent job.

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35

9. On the other hand, the Petitioners in this case has sought for a direction

to the Opposite Parties/ State to disburse an amount of Rs.5,00,000/-

(Rupees Five Lakh only) towards compensation for the death of their

son. To that effect, the Petitioners also placed reliance on the judgment

dated 30.01.2024 passed by the learned Division Bench of this Court in

W.A. No.1677 of 2022 as stated supra.

As it appears, learned Division Bench while deciding the W.A.

No.1677 of 2022 had taken into account the judgment dated 13.12.2023

passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.21267 of 2014 wherein numerous

judicial pronouncements have been referred to in order to decide the

issue i.e. "whether the respondent is entitled to compensation or not and under

what circumstances compensation can be awarded" and directed the State

functionary to pay Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs) to the respondent

therein."

10. In this case, though the State functionaries have taken the prompt steps

for payment of ex-gratia grant in favour of the mother of the deceased

child, but they did not take any precautionary step to avoid such

untoward incident. Therefore, a clear case for grant of a decent

compensation is made out instead of ex-gratia grant. The Compensatory

Jurisprudence aims at providing compensation to victims of harm-

typically due to wrongly acts such as negligence, breach of contract or

criminal offences seeking restoration of the original position before the

harm occurred by awarding monetary damages or other forms of

restitution. Though in the present case the original position cannot be

restored. However/ the victim's right to be compensated for losses-

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35 including physical injury, emotional distress and financial damages can

at least be awarded. The evolution of human rights law and the

recognition of victims' rights have further propelled the development of

compensatory jurisprudence, making it an integral part of the justice

delivery system. By ensuring that victims receive adequate

compensation, we can move towards a more just and compassionate

legal system that truly addresses the needs of those who have suffered

harm like the parents in the present case.

11. In such view of the matter, this Court is inclined to entertain the prayer

of the Petitioners. Accordingly, the State authority is directed to pay

compensation of Rs.8,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Lakhs) in addition to the

ex-gratia amount of Rs.2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs) already declared

by the District Education Officer.

12. However, in order to ensure the safety of the students in Primary

Schools, Upper Primary Schools and High Schools, it is ordered that:

(i) A District Education Infrastructure Safety Audit Committee has to

be formed in each district headed by the District Magistrate and

Collector along with the members like District Education Officer

and Block Education Officer (s), Executive Engineer of Works

Department and/or R.D. and P.W.D. Departments, Executive

Officer of Municipality and/ or NAC, Block Development

Officer(s) and some of the selected members/ Headmasters of

some High Schools and Head Pandits of some of the Primary

Schools and Upper Primary Schools.

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35

(ii) Such Committee shall ensure the safety audit of each and every

Schools of the district and issue Safety Certificate to the School

Authority every year in the month of June.

(iii) The District Education Infrastructure Safety Audit Committee

shall meet at least twice a year. The Committee will form Sub-

Committee of Engineers pertaining to the Departments of R.D and

P.W.D. and ensure safety audit of the school infrastructures which

shall recommend for issuance of Safety Certificate to the School

Authority. There shall be a grievance redressal mechanism under

the aegis of District Education Infrastructure Safety Audit

Committee at every block level.

(iv) It is the duty of the School Headmaster of every School to report

to the concerned B.D.O. regarding unsafe wall and scrub up any

school building and the B.D.O. shall immediately take up the

issue before the District Education Infrastructure Safety Audit

Committee so that the issue can be resolved at the earliest

possible. The District Magistrate and Collector shall be the

monitoring authority for the safety of the children to prevent such

kind of mishap in School Campuses.

(v) The School Headmaster and the Block Education Officer will be

held responsible for any kind of mishap due to falling of wall or

roof.

(vi) The School and Mass Education Department shall have a Disaster

Management Team to mitigate any kind of disaster in the form of

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35 falling of wall, fire or any other kind of calamity faced by the

Schools.

13.The Government has the liberty to improvise the guidelines issued

above or issue a detailed guidelines incorporating some more points

since the aforestated guidelines are only indicative for mitigating the

future mishap. A comprehensive affidavit to be filed by the Secretary,

Department of School and Mass Education, Government of Odisha after

notifying the aforementioned directives to all the districts of the State.

The said exercise shall be completed within three months from today.

14. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of being allowed.

15. Urgent certified copy of this judgment be issued to the Petitioner and a

free copy of the same be handed over to the learned counsel for the

State.

( Dr. S.K. Panigrahi ) Judge

Orissa High Court, Cuttack, Dated the 25th June, 2024/ B. Jhankar

Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUTTACK Date: 25-Jun-2024 17:32:35

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter