Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Prakash Kumar Mallick And Others vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 10235 Ori

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10235 Ori
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2024

Orissa High Court

Prakash Kumar Mallick And Others vs State Of Odisha & Others .... Opp. ... on 20 June, 2024

Author: Sashikanta Mishra

Bench: Sashikanta Mishra

                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                 W.P.(C) No. 12585 of 2024

            Prakash Kumar Mallick and Others                 ....             Petitioners

                                                                    Represented by
                                                         Mr. J.R. Khuntia, Advocate
                                                                                  .
                                           - Versus -
            State of Odisha & others                          ....        Opp. Parties
                                                                     Represented by
                                                              Mr. S.N. Patnaik, AGA
                                            CORAM:
                   THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA

                                                 ORDER

20.06.2024 Order No.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

01.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Addl. Government Advocate for the State.

3. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking the following relief:

"Under the above circumstances, it is humbly prayed that the writ application be allowed;

And

(a) a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order by directing the Opposite Parties to treat the petitioners to be absorbed as Sikshya Sahayak with effect from 08.07.2008 since the petitioners are engaged in the vacant post of Sikshya Sahayaks and are having the same qualification as that of the Sikshya Sahayaks and are performing the same duty that is available for Sikshya Sahayaks in a primary school as per the policy decision of the State Government and accordingly to treat the petitioners as Junior Teacher with effect from 08.07.2011 and Regular Primary School Teacher with effect from 08.07.2014 instead of 01.03.2017, in terms of the Resolution of the Government dated 16.02.2008 under Annexure-1 and the carrier advancement policy formulated vide resolution dated

10.01.2008 under Annexure-5 and also keeping in view the ratio decided by this Hon'ble Court in the case of Dhananjaya Charan Dey Vrs. State of Orissa and others, reported in 2020 (II) ILR-Cut-84, which has been upheld by the Division bench of this Hon'ble Court in W.A. No. 10 of 2021, disposed of on 02.02.2021 and so also which has been confirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP(C) Nos. 13627 of 2021, decided on 25.01.2023 (State of Odisha and Ors. Vrs. Dhananjaya Charan Dey and Ors.) within a time to be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court; And

(b) any other order/orders or direction/ directions be issued so as to give complete relief to the petitioners;

And for this act of kindness, the petitioners shall as in duty bound ever pray."

4. The case of the petitioners are that they were initially engaged as an Education Volunteers under Education Guarantee Scheme (EGS). Upon abolition of the said scheme, the Education Volunteers were rehabilitated as Gana Sikshyakas under the Sarba Sikshya Abhijan of the Government as per Resolution dated 16.02.2008. Subsequently, the Government took a decision that the Carrer Advancement Policy of Gana Sikshyakas will be worked out keeping in view the Career Advancement Policy of Sikshya Sahayaks. It is claimed by the petitioners that they should have been extended the benefit of Carrer Advancement Policy being treated as Junior Teacher w.e.f. 2011 and regular Teacher w.e.f. 2014. However, they were granted the benefit of Level-V Asst. Teacher (Ex-cadre) as per orders dated 30.12.2017 and 20.10.2017 of the District Education Officer, Jajpur, copy enclosed as Annexure-7 series. The petitioners strongly rely upon the judgment of this Court passed in Dhananjay Charan Dey & Ors. vs. State of Orissa & Ors1 .

2020(II) ILR-CUT-84

5. Since it is for the concerned authority to take a decision on the grievance of the petitioners at the first instance, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to approach the Secretary, Department of School and Mass Education (Opposite Party No.1) by submitting fresh representations individually highlighting their grievances within a month and in such event the Secretary shall consider and dispose of the representations of the petitioners as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months thereafter.

(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge

B.C.Tudu

Signed by: BHIGAL CHANDRA TUDU Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 21-Jun-2024 18:50:06

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter