Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 12714 Ori
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MATA No.96 of 2023
Rajashree Pradhan @ Rajashri .... Appellants
Pradhan and another
Mr. P. S. Nayak, Advocate
-Versus-
Sarada Prasad Jena .... Respondent
Mr. P. K. Mohanty, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
ORDER
13.10.2023 Order No.
03. 1. Mr. Nayak, learned advocate appears on behalf of
appellants (wife and son). He submits, by impugned judgment
dated 23rd February, 2023 the Family Court dissolved the
marriage but did not grant permanent alimony nor
maintenance for the son. Being aggrieved his clients have
preferred the appeal.
2. On brief perusal of impugned judgment we notice, the
Court below found appellant no.1 to have government job and
lack of evidence adduced by her regarding respondent-
husband's income. On query from Court Mr. Nayak submits,
though respondent-husband entered appearance but did not
contest at trial.
3. Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate appears on behalf of
respondent-husband. On query from Court he submits, his
client does not have income. He has been named as accused in
several criminal cases.
4. Appellants are to consider regarding prosecution of the
appeal. If they so desire, it will be heard on adjourned date.
5. List on 15.11.2023.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge
(S. K. Mishra) Judge
Padma
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: PADMA CHARAN DASH Reason: Authentication Location: orissa high court cuttack Date: 16-Oct-2023 10:50:09
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!