Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramakrishna Nayak vs State Of Odisha & Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 11996 Ori

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 11996 Ori
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2023

Orissa High Court
Ramakrishna Nayak vs State Of Odisha & Others on 5 October, 2023
                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                                W.P.(C) No.29809 of 2023
                 Ramakrishna Nayak                     ....            Petitioner
                                            Mr.Achyutananda Pattnaik, Advocate

                                             -versus-

                 State of Odisha & others                ....    Opposite Parties
                                                          Mr.Saswat Das, A.G.A.


                                         CORAM:

                              JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA


Order No.                                    ORDER
                                            05.10.2023

    01.     1.      This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
            /Physical Mode).
            2.      Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned
            Additional Government Advocate for the State. Perused the Writ
            Petition as well as the documents annexed thereto.
            3.      The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the
            following prayer:
                           " In the above facts and circumstance, it is most
                    humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court
                    may graciously be pleased to admit the writ petition,
                    issue notice to the Opp.Parties and after hearing the
                    parties this Hon'ble Court may further be pleased
                    i)     To set aside the order passed by the DG of Police
                           in Memo No.44431/pers-I, dated 04.11.2022 and
                           subsequent letter No.1456/Esst. Dated 1.08.2023
                           of SP, Bhadrak.
                    ii)    To direct the Opp.Parties to give compassionate
                            // 2 //




           appointment to the Petitioner under Home
           Department       sympathetically   taking    into
           consideration the retrospectively Rule i.e. OCS
           (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rule, 1992 as per his
           qualification on account of death of his father,
           (who was working as Havildar under Bonta
           Police station under Superintendent of Police,
           Bhadrak and who was died on 23.11.2002 while
           on his Govt. duty)
           And, may pass any other order/orders as may
      deem fit and proper;"

4.    It is submitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the
father of the Petitioner namely Pitambar Nayak while working as
Havildar in Odisha Police posted at Bonta Police Station died in
harness on 23.11.2002. Thereafter, on 14.10.2004 the Petitioner
being one of the legal heirs with the consent of the legal heirs
applied for appointment under compassionate ground under
OCS(RA) Rule, 1990. Such application of the Petitioner was again
taken up for verification after a long delay on 23.05.2016. An enquiry
report was submitted on 08.06.2016 before the Superintendent of
Police, Bhadrak by the I.I.C., Dhusuri P.S. Again no step was taken.
While the matter stood thus, on 25.03.2021 the Petitioner again
submitted a representation before the Director General of Police,
Odisha     with a prayer to give him appointment under the
Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme. Since no action was taken, the
Petitioner earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.32638
of 2021 challenging the inaction on the part of the Opposite Parties
and a coordinate Bench of this Court on 25.10.2021 disposed of the
said Writ Petition directing the authorities to consider the application
of the Petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground. Pursuant
to such order of the coordinate Bench, the application of the
Petitioner was taken up for consideration by the D.G. of Police and
                            // 3 //




vide his memo dated 04.11.2022 the application of the Petitioner was
rejected on the ground of limitation. It has been specifically stated in
the rejection order that there is a delay of 10 months 21 days in
preferring the application for appointment on compassionate ground.
Further, the Petitioner was advised to make a fresh application under
the new Rule. Pursuant to such Memo dated 04.11.2022, the
Petitioner under compulsion made another application under the new
Rule of the year 2020 on 02.01.2023. The authorities vide order dated
01.08.2023

again rejected the prayer of the Petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground on the ground that the Petitioner has not obtained the required number of points under OCS(RA) Rule, 2020.

5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at this juncture referring to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Malayaanda Sethi, vrs.-State of Orissa and others reported in 2022(II) OLR (SC)-1 Suchitra Bal-vrs.- State of Odisha and others by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.2081 of 2021 decided on 16.03.2023 as well as Bindusagar Samantaray vs.-State of Odisha and others by a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.810 of 2021 decided on 25.09.2023 submitted before this Court that so far as the present Petitioner is concerned, the prayer for appointment on compassionate ground should have been considered under OCS(RA) Rule, 1990 and not under the new Rule 2020 as the father of the Petitioner died much prior to the new Rule came into force i.e. in the year 2002. In such view of the matter, learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the impugned rejection order is unsustainable in law and the order is liable to be quashed.

6. Learned Additional Standing Counsel on the other hand contended that initially there was a delay of 10 months 21 days as // 4 //

has been mentioned in the impugned rejection order in filing the application and the delay can only be condoned by the State Government. However, the authorities considered the case of the Petitioner as per the order passed by this Court in the earlier Writ Petition subject to the Petitioner's eligibility the matter would have been placed before the Government for condonation of delay. However since the Petitioner could not secure the required points the question of condonaton of delay does not arise. Accordingly it was submitted by the learned Additional Government Advocate that the Opposite Parties have not committed any illegality in rejecting the application of the Petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground. He further submitted that the Writ Petition is devoid of merit and the same cannot be entertained. Mr.Das, learned Additional Government Advocate refers to the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State of West Bengal-v.-Debabrata Tiwari reported in ((2023(3) SCALE 557.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and on a careful consideration of their submissions as well as background facts of the case, this Court observes that factually there is no dispute in the submissions of both sides. The only dispute is with regard to the applicability of the Rule to the facts of the present case. In such background, this Court further found that admittedly the father of the Petitioner died on 23.11.2002. No-doubt, initially application was made on 14.10.2004 after a delay of 10 months. The same was kept pending for more than a decade and reactivated only in the year 2016. Such inaction on the part of the Opposite Parties is not appreciated by this Court and the same goes against the principle of justice. This Court on a careful analysis of the judgment referred to herein above is of the considered view that the law is well settled // 5 //

that the application of the Petitioner should have been considered under the OCS(RA) Rule, 1990. Accordingly, this Court has no hesitation in setting aside the impugned rejection order under Annexures-18 and 20. Accordingly the order under Annxures-18 and 20 are hereby quashed and the matter is remanded to consider the matter afresh under the OCS(RA) Rule, 1990 and a final decision be taken within a period of two months from the date of communication of the certified copy of this order. It is directed that necessary steps be taken by the authority for taking up the matter for condonation of delay of 10 months 21 days in filing the application under the OCS(RA) Rule 1990 and in such eventuality the competent authority in the Government shall consider the matter and take a decision within a period of six months and the matter be placed before such competent authority. The final decision if any taken by the authority be communicated to the Petitioner within two weeks. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is directed to file an application for condonation of delay which shall be forwarded to the competent authority of the Government for consideration.

8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of.

9. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules.

RKS                                                        ( A.K. Mohapatra )
                                                                 Judge




      Signature Not Verified
      Digitally Signed
      Signed by: RAMESH KUMAR SINGH
      Designation: Ex-A.R.-cum-Sr. Secretary
      Reason: Authentication
      Location: High Court of Orissa
      Date: 09-Oct-2023 10:40:33
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter