Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5817 Ori
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C)(OA) No.1594 of 2014
Prakash Chandra Nayak .... Petitioner
Mr. C.R. Pattnaik, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & Ors. .... Opposite Parties
Mr. M.K. Balabantaray, AGA
Mr. B.P. Tripathy, Advocate
(Opp. Party No. 4)
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
11.05.2023 Order No
04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. Mr. B.P. Tripathy, learned counsel appearing for the Commission vehemently contended that even though in terms of the advertisement the Petitioner was not coming within the age group, but the Govt. without any reason and basis condoned his age and allowed him to take part in the recruitment process vide Annexure- 5 dtd.27.03.2014.
4. Even though notice of the matter has been issued since 23.07.2014, but no counter affidavit has been filed by the State- Opp. Parties justifying the issuance of Annexure-5 in favour of the Petitioner.
5. On the request made by Mr. Balabantaray, learned AGA, list this matter on 17.05.2023, by which time he will file an affidavit // 2 //
justifying the reason for issuing Annexure-5 in favour of the Petitioner.
6. The Judgments relied on by Mr. Tripathy produced in Court today be kept in record.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Sneha
Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Signed by: SNEHANJALI PARIDA Designation: Jr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Cuttack Date: 15-May-2023 19:40:47
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!