Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chakradhar Punji And vs State Of Odisha
2023 Latest Caselaw 5779 Ori

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5779 Ori
Judgement Date : 11 May, 2023

Orissa High Court
Chakradhar Punji And vs State Of Odisha on 11 May, 2023
             IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                           CRLA No.414 of 2023

              Chakradhar Punji and                ....    Appellants/
              others                                     Petitioners

                                 Mr. S.K. Joshi, Advocate

                                       -versus-

              State of Odisha                     ....   Respondent/
                                                         Opp. Party

                                 Mr. Arupananda Das
                                 Addl. Govt. Advocate

                                 CORAM:
                            JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO
                                   ORDER
Order No.                        11.05.2023

   02.           This   matter    is    taken     up   through   Hybrid

arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

Learned counsel for the appellants has filed the consolidated cause title, which is taken on record.

Heard.

Admit.

Call for the trial Court record.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

I.A. No.897 of 2023

03. This is an application under Section 389 of // 2 //

Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

Heard.

The appellants-petitioners have been convicted under sections 147/341/342/323/354/355/506/149 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of three years and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of six months for the offences under sections 354/149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of three months for the offences under sections 355/149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of three months for the offences under sections 506/149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of one month and to pay a fine of Rs.500/- (rupees five hundred), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of seven days for the offences under sections 341/149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of fifteen days for the offences under sections 342/149 of the Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (rupees one thousand), in default,

// 3 //

to undergo further R.I. for a period of fifteen days for the offences under sections 323/149 of the Indian Penal Code and R.I. for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- (rupees five thousand), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of one month for the offences under sections 147/149 of the Indian Penal Code and all the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kantabanji in Sessions Case No.38 of 2018.

Perused the impugned judgment.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners were on bail during trial and they have never misutilised their liberty in any manner and the substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial Court against the petitioners is for three years and there are good chances of success in the appeal and there is no chance of early hearing of appeal in the near future and balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioners and therefore, the bail application of the petitioners may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature of evidence adduced by the prosecution during trial and the fact that the petitioners were on bail during trial and there

// 4 //

is no allegation of misutilization of their liberty while on bail and absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, the prayer for bail is allowed.

Let the appellants-petitioners be released on bail pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) each with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.

The I.A. is disposed of.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

I.A. No.896 of 2023

04. Heard.

There shall be stay of realization of fine amount imposed by the learned trial Court on the appellants- petitioners till disposal of the criminal appeal.

The I.A. is disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.

( S.K. Sahoo) Judge

RKM

RABINDRA Digitally signed by RABINDRA KUMAR KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2023.05.12 MISHRA 17:29:59 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter