Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra vs State Of Odisha And Others
2023 Latest Caselaw 4765 Ori

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4765 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 May, 2023

Orissa High Court
Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra vs State Of Odisha And Others on 1 May, 2023
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                                 W.P.(C) No.8726 of 2023


                 Rajesh Kumar Mohapatra.          ....           Petitioner
                                      Mr. Durgesh Narayan Rath, Advocate

                                              -versus-

                 State of Odisha and others              ....          Opp. Parties
                                                              Mr. Iswar Mohanty, ASC




                             CORAM:
                            JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
                                        ORDER
Order No.                              01.05.2023

    02.     1.      This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement
            (Virtual /Physical Mode).

2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties.

3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:-

"Under the above circumstances, it is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to issue a writ in the nature of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order by quashing the order issued by the opposite party no.2 dated 02.03.2023 under Annexure-12 to the writ application.

And this Hon'ble Court be further pleased to direct the opposite parties to issue appointment order in favour of the petitioner, under OCS // 2 //

(Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990, taking into consideration the educational qualification of the petitioner, within a stipulated period.

And the Hon'ble Court be pleased to pass any further order or orders as would be deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case."

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that earlier the Petitioner approached the authorities for appointment under the OCS (RA) Rules, 1990 by submitting an application under the said rules. Such application having been rejected by the authorities vide order dated 27.07.2020 and 17.2.2021 under Annexure-7 & 8 respectively. The Petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.34929 of 2022. This Court after hearing the learned counsel for the parties vide order dated 22.12.2022 disposed of the writ petition by setting aside the impugned orders dated 27.07.2020 and 17.2.2021 under Annexure-7 & 8 respectively and the matter was remanded back to the Opposite Party No.2-Director, Health Services, Heads of the Department Building, Bhubaneswar to consider the application of the Petitioner afresh in the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme court in the case of Malaya Nanda Sethy vrs. State of Orissa and others, reported in 2022(II) OLR(SC)-1.

5. Learned counsel for the Petitioner at this juncture submitted that after disposal of the aforesaid writ petition, the Petitioner again approached the Opposite Party No.2- Director, // 3 //

Health Services, Heads of the Department Building, Bhubaneswar. The Opposite Party No.2 vide order dated 02.03.2023 has again rejected the application of the Petitioner. He further contended that while rejecting the application of the Petitioner vide order dated 02.03.2023, the Opposite Party No.2 has not taken into consideration the law laid down in Malaya Nanda Sethy's case (supra) as directed by this Court vide order dated 22.12.2022 passed in the earlier writ petition of the Petitioner. Accordingly, the Petitioner has approached this Court by filing the present writ petition.

6. Learned Additional Standing Counsel appearing for the State-Opposite Parties, on the other hand, submitted that the rejection order dated 02.03.2023 under Annexure-12 is a reasoned and speaking order. He further submitted that the Opposite Party No.2 while considering the case of the Petitioner afresh as directed by this Court has taken note of all the aspects and, accordingly, rejected the application of the Petitioner by giving reasons. Therefore, learned Additional Standing Counsel submitted that no fault can be found with the Opposite Party No.2 while disposing of the representation of the Petitioner vide order dated 02.03.2023 under Annexure-

12. He in course of his argument also relied upon the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of The State of West Bengal v. Debabrata Tiwari & Ors. Etc. Etc. (Civil Appeal Nos.8842- 8855 of 2022 decided on 3rd March, 2023).

7. After considering the submissions made by the learned // 4 //

counsel appearing for the respective parties and upon a perusal of the impugned order dated 02.03.2023 under Annexure-12 and further keeping in view the factual background of the present case, this Court observes that the Opposite Party No.2 while disposing of the representation vide the impugned order dated 02.03.2023 under Annexure-12 has not taking into consideration the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Malaya Nanda Sethy's case (supra). This appears to be contrary to the direction issued by this Court in the earlier round of writ petition. This Court further feels that the Opposite Party No.2-Director, Health Services, Heads of the Department Building, Bhubaneswar should have been more careful while disposing of the representation of the Petitioner and should have followed the direction issued by this Court vide order dated 22.12.2022 in the earlier writ petition. Without referring to the judgment in Malaya Nanda Sethy's case (supra), the Opposite Party No.2 has disposed of the application of the Petitioner by referring to the Notification of the G.A. & P.G. Department dated 17.02.2020.

8. In such view of the matter, this Court thinks it proper to quash the impugned order dated 02.03.2023 passed by the Director of Health Intelligence & Vital Statistics, Odisha under Annexure-12 and, accordingly, the same is hereby quashed. The matter is remanded back to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the matter afresh and keeping in view the direction // 5 //

given by this Court vide order dated 22.12.2022 passed in W.P.(C) No.34929 of 2022 and in the light of the judgment in Malaya Nanda Sethy's case (supra) and disposed of the application of the Petitioner within a period of two months from the date of communication of this order by passing a reasoned and speaking order. The decision so taken thereon shall be communicated to the Petitioner within two weeks thereafter.

9. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge

DEBASIS AECH Digitally signed by DEBASIS AECH Date: 2023.05.02 20:27:48 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter