Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2619 Ori
Judgement Date : 31 March, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLA No.834 of 2017
Naik Majhi Appellant
Mr.B. Nayak,
Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha .... Respondent
Mr.S.S. Mohapatra,
ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE D.DASH
DR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
ORDER
31.03.2023 Order No. Misc. Case No.2157 of 2017
06. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement (virtual/physical) mode.
2. Mr.B. Nayak, learned counsel for the Appellant, instead of pressing this application for grant of bail, prays for early hearing of this Appeal on merit subject to the convenience of the Court. He submits that even today if the Court pleases, he is ready for hearing.
3. The prayer of the learned counsel for the Appellant is accepted as the learned counsel for the State gives his consent in submitting that he is also ready for hearing.
4. The Misc. Case is accordingly disposed of.
(D. Dash) Judge
(Dr.S.K.Panigrahi) Judge
// 2 //
ORDER 31.03.2023 Order No. CRLA No.834 of 2017
07. 1. On the consent of learned counsels for the parties, the hearing of the Appeal is taken up.
2. The hearing being concluded; judgment is reserved.
(D. Dash) Judge
(Dr.S.K.Panigrahi) Judge
Basu
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!