Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 15762 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 6610 of 2006
Krushna Prasad Sahoo ..... Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Nanda, Advocate &
Mr. Gautam Mishra, Sr. Advocate
(Amicus Curiae)
Vs.
State of Orissa and others ..... Opposite parties
Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, AGA
CORAM:
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
08.12.2023
Order No. I.A. No. 8807 of 2023
46. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This Interlocutory Application has been filed by Mrs. Mrinalini Padhi, a practicing advocate of this Court, to be impleaded as a party to the present writ petition.
3. Considering the averments made in this application, the prayer for impletion of party is allowed and she is impleaded as opposite party no.9. Office to carry out necessary correction in the cause title.
4. In the I.A. she has brought to the notice of this Court that in view of the judgment of the apex Court in the case of "Inhuman Conditions in 1382 Prisons" [(2016) 3 SCC 700, the Government has to take all the measures, as have been discussed in the said judgment, but the same have not been effectively adhered to. She has raised her concern about the Education of Children in Jails and the Nutrition of Jail Inmates.
5. Under the heading of "Education of Children in Jails", she has brought to the notice of this Court that the children of Jail inmates of the age 0-6 should be taken care of and sent to the nearest Anganwadi Centers. Thereafter, they should be sent to nearest Schools and given all other facilities, as available to other children. The Schemes of the Government, for the welfare of ST, SC, Minorities and Other Backward Classes, have not been taken into consideration in their respect. The children in jails, those belonging to the ST/SC/OBCs, should also be given the same facilities of the welfare schemes. The apex Court, in the case of R.D. Upadhya v. State of A.P. [(2007) 15 SCC 3371, has also discussed various issues pertaining to women and children. But the same has also not been taken care of. In the said judgment it is stated that a child should not be treated as an under trial/convict while in jail with his/her mother. Such a child is entitled to food, shelter, medical care, clothing, education and recreational facilities as a matter of right.
6. Under the heading "Nutrition of Jail Inmates", she has brought to the notice of the Court that the UTPs and convicts, when engaged in voluntary labour, should be given "Labouring Diet"
7. According to her, the Odisha Model Jail Manual, 2020 states in Chapter-XXXVII "Maintenance of Prisoners" (Food Clothing, Bedding, Sanitary Regulation) Conservancy, Water Supply, to the following effect:-
"913. Food - For the purposes of diet prisoners shall be classified as follows:
(a) Prisoners of Division I & II, Sub-divided into:
(i) Class-I laboring;
(ii) Class-II Non-labouring.
(b) Division-III Prisoners, sub-divided into:
(i) Labouring;
(ii) Non-labouring.
(c) The diet shall be provided to the inmates of
jails as per the diet scale, to be fixed by the State Govt.
from time to time and the present diet scale shall be fixed by the Government in the Home Department @ 2816.74 K.Cal per prisoner per day."
8. According to her, the laboring diets have not been specified by the Government till date.
9. Mr. D.K. Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate is directed to file an affidavit by the next date as to how the aforesaid aspects have been dealt with by the Government.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Mr. Goutam Mishra, learned Senior Advocate, who has been engaged as Amicus Curiae in this case, brought to the notice of this Court about the fact of overcrowding in Sub-Jail, Jajpur and Special Sub-Jail, Bhadrak, overcrowding figures regarding other jails and Prison Population at Bhubaneswar, by filing a short note in Court today. The same be placed on record.
2. On perusal of the records, it appears that the issue of overcrowding regarding aforesaid two jails, namely, Sub-Jail, Jajpur and Special Sub-Jail, Bhadrak has been continuing for more than past one and half years. He further contended that the said issue has already been dealt with by this Court in paragraphs-5 and 6 of the order no.26 dated 31.05.2021; paragraphs-3 and 8 of order no.29 dated 16.07.2021; paragraphs- 2 and 3 of order no.30 dated
26.08.2021; paragraphs 28 and 29 of order no. 33 dated 23.12.2021; paragraphs-1 and 2 of order no. 36 dated 22.03.2022 ; paragraph-4 of order no. 40 dated 21.05.2022; paragraphs-8 and 9 of order no. 41 dated 28.07.2022; paragraph-3 of order no. 43 dated 10.11.2022; paragraph-1 of order no. 44 dated 09.01.2023; and paragraph-3 of order no. 45 dated 09.03.2023. But till date the same has not been complied with by enhancing the capacity of the respective jails.
3. As per the recent list of excess prison population collected on 27.11.2023, the following are the details, so far as sub-jail at Jajpur and special sub-jail at Bhadrak are concerned.
Sl. Name of Jail Scheduled Present Excess Percentage No. Capacity Population Population of Excess Population
1. Sub-Jail, 133 186 53 39.84% Jajpur
2. Special Sub- 201 295 94 46.76% Jail, Bhadrak
4. Copy of the short notes filed by learned Amicus Curiae has been served on Mr. D.K. Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the State. He has also accepted the contention raised by learned Amicus Curiae. Relying on the affidavit filed in June, 2023, he contended that so far as construction of additional jail in Bhadrak District is concerned, the same is continuing, but what is the time line fixed for completion of the work, that figure has not been placed in the said affidavit. Therefore, he prays for grant of some time to obtain concrete instruction with regard to the timeline fixed for completion of the said work.
5. He further contended that so far as Jajpur district is concerned, whether any construction work is undertaken or not, that fact is not available with him, therefore, he wants some time to get instructions
with regard to the same.
6. As a matter of fact, it is not the only problem, so far as Sub- Jail, Jajpur and Special Sub-Jail, Bhadrak are concerned. It has been brought to our notice that many of the Jails, Sub-Jails and Special Jails have been overcrowded because of increase in population and crime in the State. As such, the UTPs are facing a lot of difficulties because of overcrowding. That apart, the Jails or Sub- Jails in most of the places were constructed much prior to bifurcation of the districts, but due to growth in population as well as crime, it is highly essential to have new Sub-jails, Special Jails or District Jails in different locations, so that the overcrowding can be managed by shifting the convicts and UTPs to the nearby jails. A policy decision on the part of the State Government, is required to be taken, so far as construction of Sub-Jails, Special Jails or District Jails in different locations is concerned, as per the requirement owing to commission of crime in the locality. Such policy decision has to be taken as expeditiously as possible, because if somebody is put behind the bar as a convict or UTP or kept in judicial custody, first of all he/she is a human being and a citizen of India and, as such, it is the first and foremost responsibility of the Government to treat him/her equally with the general public who are remaining outside the jail premises. The inaction on the part of the State Government in providing the basic minimum facilities like food, shelter and clothing amounts to violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that it is high time when the State should take prompt corrective measures to have more Sub-Jails, Special Jails or District Jails at different locations by taking a policy decision at their level. Such decision should be taken at the earliest.
7. It is of relevance to make a mention that the Legal Services Authorities have to discharge their responsibilities and see that the prisoners should get adequate legal aid and other benefits, which they are entitled to according to the authority. Therefore, this Court directs the Legal Services Authorities to take adequate steps and also visit the jails frequently and periodically to get the feedback as to how the convicts and UTPs are being treated and whether or not they have been provided with minimum basic facilities like food, shelter and clothing, besides ascertaining the behavior of the authorities towards them. So far as hygienic condition is concerned, more particularly in the wash rooms, in the drinking water points and other places, the same should have been taken care of and report to that extent has to be submitted on monthly basis, more particularly in this case, so that the same can be taken care of.
8. Apart from the above, Health Department of the State Government is also directed to take necessary steps to have periodical medical check-up of the convicts and UTPs in each of the jails and reports to that effect be also furnished before this Court. There should not be any laxity in extending the health care facilities either to the convicts or UTPs in the jails.
9. Similarly, so far as infrastructure is concerned, it is Home Department, which has to supply the same adequately and take necessary timely steps to maintain cleanliness in the premises so that convicts and UTPs remain in clean a environment and minimum facilities, such as, newspaper and other articles should be provided to them. There should be physical exercise and 'yoga' in a routine manner every day, so that their body and mind will remain fit.
10. All such requirements are to be complied with by the Government. Hence, Mr. Debakanta Mohanty, learned Additional Government Advocate prayed for and granted time till next date to take necessary instruction and file affidavit in the aforesaid aspects.
11. Call this matter on 21.12.2023.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Designation: ADR-cum-Addl. Principal Secretary
Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 08-Dec-2023 17:28:51
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!