Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4317 Ori
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RVWPET No.34 of 2023
Itishree Rout and Others .... Petitioners
Mr. D.C. Dey, Advocate
-versus-
Sarat Chandra Swain and Another .... Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Mahali, counsel for Opposite Party No.2
CORAM:
SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY
ORDER
25.4.2023 Order No.
04. 1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard Mr. D.C. Dey, learned counsel for the claimant - Petitioner and Mr. P.K. Mahali, learned counsel for insurer - Opposite Party No.2.
3. Initially, this court by order dated 30th March, 2022 disposed of the appeal in MACA No.255 of 2019 confirming the award and compensation amount granted by the tribunal. Challenging same the claimant - Appellant approached Hon'ble Supreme Court in SLP (Civil) No.35435 of 2022. The Supreme Court by order dated 20th January, 2023 disposed of the appeal granting liberty to the claimant - Petitioners to approach the High Court in a review petition. The relevant portion of the order of the Supreme Court dated 20th January, 2023 is reproduced below:-
"xxxx xxxxx xxxxx
From the perusal of the impugned judgment and order, we find force in the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the Petitioners.
We feel that no useful purpose would be served by keeping this petition pending before this court. The interest of justice would stand served if the petitioners are permitted to file a review petition before the High Court seeking consideration of their claim with respect to incidental charges and expenses incurred in that regard during the period from the date of accident till he expired.
Accordingly, we dispose of this special leave petition giving liberty to petitioners to approach the High Court with a review petition in this regard and with a request to the high Court to consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously.
xxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxx"
4. As seen from the above order, the scope of review is in respect of the incidental charges and expenses incurred during the period from the date of accident till the date of death of the deceased. The accident took place on 16th January, 2014 and the deceased, namely Ranjan Rout died on 31st May, 2017. He died in his residence.
5. This court called for the original LCR for perusal. As seen from the documents produced on record, separate medicine bills were produced by the injured in course of his examination as P.W.1. According to the evidence of P.W.1, he was treated as indoor patient from 16th January, 2014 to 22nd February, 2014 at Aswini Hospital, Cuttack and from 8th August, 2014 to 13th August, 2014 at Regional Spinal Injury Centre of SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack. The injured produced the discharge certificates issued by Aswini
Hospital and SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, three out- patient slips, pathology reports of Aswini Hospital, CT Scan report, MRI report and ECG report and bunch of medicine bills. He did not say about any specific amount in his evidence towards ancillary charges or expenses incurred by him after he was discharged from the hospital. The tribunal has considered all such amounts mentioned in the medicine bills produced by the injured to determine the medical expenses at Rs.8,30,000/-.
6. In course of hearing in the present review petition, no such document could also be produced by the claimants to reveal any further expenses incurred by the injured towards ancillary charges and expenses. However in absence of any document produced in respect of such expenses, keeping in view the probable cost of attendant charges, special diet, transportation cost etc incurred by the injured during his period of treatment as an indoor patient and otherwise, a further consolidated sum of Rs.2,00,000/-, in the opinion of this court, would serve the purpose. The amount is determined keeping in view the place of residence of the injured and that SCB Medical College is a Government Hospital.
7. At this stage it is submitted at the Bar that in the meantime an amount of Rs.42,60,700/- including interest has been paid and already received by the claimants.
8. In the result, the review petition is disposed of with a direction to the insurer - Appellant to deposit a further consolidated sum of Rs.2,00,000/- (two laksh) before the tribunal within a period of two months from today, where-after the same shall be disbursed in favour
of the claimants on such terms and proportion to be decided by learned tribunal.
9. The original LCR be returned forthwith.
10. An urgent certified copy of this order be issued as per rules.
( B.P. Routray) Judge M.K.Panda
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!