Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5903 Ori
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.16845 of 2012
(Through Hybrid mode)
Jaladhar Jena .... Petitioner
Mr. A. Sahoo, Advocate
Mr. Susanta Kumar Dash, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and others .... Opposite Parties
Mr. Chandrakanta Pradhan, Senior Panel Counsel
CORAM: JUSTICE ARINDAM SINHA
ORDER
Order No. 26.10.2022 11. 1. The disposed of writ petition has been listed under heading
'To be Mentioned' at instance of Court.
2. Mr. Sahoo, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner
while Mr. Pradhan, learned advocate, Senior Panel Counsel, for
opposite parties.
3. The listing was on notice of inadvertent typographical errors
in judgment dated 18th October, 2022, by which the writ petition was
// 2 //
disposed of. In some paragraphs in the judgment, word 'negligence'
has been preceded by word 'contributory'.
4. Word 'contributory', wherever appears in the judgment
preceding word 'negligence' be deleted. The corrections be deemed
to have been incorporated in said judgment.
(Arindam Sinha) Judge Prasant
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!