Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9423 Ori
Judgement Date : 8 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
AHO No.48 of 2000
Amulya Tripathy and others .... Appellants
Mr. A.B. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Sumati Tripathy and Others .... Respondents
Mr. R.N. Acharya, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.K. MISHRA
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
08.09.2021
I.A. No.16 of 2019 Order No.
12. 1. This I.A. is taken up through Hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. In this I.A., the appellants has made the following prayer:-
"It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the
// 2 //
application directing correction of typographical mistake in the judgment dated 01.05.2019 appearing in paragraph-7 (quoted from para-19
(a) of the Judgment dated 05.07.1999), by substitution Plot No.165/856 as Plot No.105/856 and/or may be pleased to pass such other order as it may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case".
4. Having heard learned counsel for the appellants, we are of the opinion that the appellants have not demonstrated prima facie that typographical error crept in the record. We find no merit in the I.A. Therefore, the I.A. is dismissed.
5. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted as per rules.
(S.K. Mishra) Judge
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
T.TUDU
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!