Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 11372 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2021
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.32220 OF 2021
Santosh Kumar Patra ..... Petitioner
Mr. B. Routray,
Sr.Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha ..... Opposite party
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
06.11.2021
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to the opposite party to take effective steps to issue necessary pension order within a stipulated time.
4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made representation to the opposite party vide Annexure-9 series and the same may be directed to be considered and disposed of within a stipulated time taking into consideration of the judgment in Harbans Lal v. State of Punjab (CWP No.2371 of 2010 decided on 31.08.2010) to which learned State Counsel has no objection.
5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and
considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-9 series and pass appropriate order in accordance with law taking into consideration of the judgment in Harbans Lal v. State of Punjab (CWP No.2371 of 2010 decided on 31.08.2010) within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy this order.
Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.
Alok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!