Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4434 Ori
Judgement Date : 30 March, 2021
CRLLP No. 34 of 2020
4. 30.03.2021 Heard learned Additional Standing Counsel for the
appellant-State.
This is an appeal to leave under Section 378 (1) and
(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The respondent was the accused person in S.T. No.
123 of 2016 in the court of learned First Addl. Sessions Judge,
Rourkela. He was charged under section 354-A/354-B and 376
(2)(k) of IPC. The Trial Court acquitted the respondent of the
charge by judgment dated 19.02.2020.
Perused the record. The Trial Court has discussed all
the evidences produced by the prosecution and on a threadbare
discussion opined that the evidence of victim is not trust worthy.
On consideration of the same and also the reasoning assigned by
the learned Trial Court, this Court is of the opinion that rightly
the Court below has passed the impugned order and there is no
illegality or irregularity in the said order. Accordingly, if leave to
appeal will be granted, the same will be a futile exercise and
abuse of process of the Court. As such, we find no reason to
grant leave.
The CRLLP is accordingly dismissed.
..........................
S. Panda, J.
............................. S.K.Panigrahi, J.
Arun
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!