Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3948 Ori
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2021
W.P.(C) No.10799 of 2021
02. 22.03.2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner has filed this application
seeking for a direction to the opposite party nos.2 and 3
to regularize his service taking into account his
continuous service of more than 19 years, as has been
done in favour of the other similarly situated persons as
per Government Circular and in terms of the principle
decided in Secretary State of Karnataka and Others
Vrs.. Umadevi (3) and Others : (2006) 4 SCC 1 and
in State of Karnataka & others Vrs. M.L. Kesari &
others, involving SLP(C) No.15774/2006.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
that the petitioner was engaged on DLR basis. He has
already rendered more than 19 years of service under
the opposite parties and therefore, seeks for
regularization of services in view of the judgment
passed by the Hon'ble apex Court in Secretary State
of Karnataka and others Vrs. Umadevi (3) and
others : (2006) 4 SCC 1 and in State of Karnataka &
others Vrs. M.L. Kesari & others involving SLP(C)
No.15774/2006.
Considering the contentions raised by the
learned counsel for the petitioner and after going
through the records, it appears that the petitioner has
rendered service for more than 19 years on DLR basis.
uks
Therefore, the case of the petitioner is squarely covered
by the ratio decided in the cases cited supra.
2
In that view of the matter, this Court
disposes of this Writ Petition directing the opposite party
nos.2 and 3 to consider the case of the petitioner and
regularize his services keeping in view the judgment in
the case of Secretary State of Karnataka and others
Vrs. Umadevi (3) and others : (2006) 4 SCC 1 and in
State of Karnataka & others Vrs. M.L. Kesari &
others, involving SLP(C) No.15774/2006 and also the
resolution of the G.A. Department dated 17.09.2013,
within a period of four months from the date of
communication of a copy of this order by the petitioner
and grant consequential service benefits as due
admissible to him. It is further directed that in the event
the petitioner is still continuing in his service, status quo
as on today in respect of the service of the petitioner
shall be maintained till a decision is taken in the matter
by the opposite party in terms of the above directions.
This Court further observes in the event
there is regular vacancy in the driver post, attempt may
also be made to regularize the service of the petitioner.
..................................
Biswanath Rath, J.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!