Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3136 Ori
Judgement Date : 3 March, 2021
W.P.(C) No. 8023 of 2006
11. 03.03.2021 The matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement
(virtual/physical mode).
None appears for the petitioner at the time of call.
Mr. S. Jena, learned Standing Counsel for School and
Mass Education Department.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to
quash the order dated 20.04.2006 passed by the authority
under Annexure-3, by which he has been disengaged from
service in view of the decision made in W.P.(C) No.14947 of
2004 dated 31.01.2005.
Mr. S. Jena, learned Standing Counsel for School and
Mass Education Department contended that the case of the
petitioner is covered by the judgment of this Court in
Hrushikesh Bindhani and others v. State of Orissa and
others (W.P.(C) No.11748 of 2003, disposed of on
29.04.2004), which has been confirmed by the apex Court. It
is contended that this Court vide order dated 24.01.2005 in
W.P.(C) No.602 of 2005 directed the authority to consider the
case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment of this
Court in Hrushikesh Bindhani mentioned supra and on
consideration of the same, the order in Annexure-3 has been
passed by the authority. Therefore, no illegality or irregularity
has been committed by the authority.
In the above view of the matter, this Court is not
inclined to entertain this writ petition, which is accordingly
dismissed.
..................................
Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI, J) .
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!