Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WP(C)/2698/2021
2021 Latest Caselaw 926 Ori

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 926 Ori
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021

Orissa High Court
WP(C)/2698/2021 on 28 January, 2021
                          W.P.(C) No. 2698 of 2021




02.   28.01.2021          The matter is taken up through video conferencing.
                          Heard Mr. T.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the
                   petitioner and Mr. B. Satpathy, learned Standing Counsel
                   for School and Mass Education Department.
                         The petitioner has filed this petition seeking direction
                   to the opposite parties to treat the petitioner at par with the
                   employees of other aided educational institutions, who have
                   been extended with grant-in-aid in accordance with Grant-
                   in-Aid Order, 1994, and accordingly to extend all benefits as
                   applicable to the aided educational institutions within the
                   meaning of Section 3(b) of the Orissa Education Act, such
                   as earned leaves as prescribed under Rule 9 of 1977 Rules,
                   extra ordinary leaves as prescribed under Rule 12 of 1977
                   Rules, as well as study leaves as prescribed under Rule 13
                   of 1977 Rules and other benefits as provided under 1977
                   Rules, Pension Rules, GPF Rules, though the same facilities
                   and   benefits   were   given   to   the   employees   of   other
                   institutions, which were notified under Section 3(b) of the
                   Orissa Education Act, 1969 pursuant to Grant-in-Aid
                   Order, 1994.
                         Mr. T.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the petitioner
                   contended that since the petitioner is working in an
                   educational institution receiving block grant, in view of the
                   judgment passed in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul v. State of
                   Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) & others, 2016 (I) ILR-
                   1162 wherein this Court has already held that the legal
                   heirs of deceased employees of educational institutions
                   receiving block grant are entitled to get compassionate
                              2




appointment, pursuant to which the Government of Odisha
in the Department of School & Mass Education has issued a
circular on 01.08.2019 granting benefit of compassionate
appointment to the legal heirs of the deceased employees
working     in   fully   aided   educational    institutions   and
educational institutions receiving grant-in-aid (New)/block
grant, therefore, other benefits as claimed in the writ
application should be extended to the petitioner.
        Mr. B. Satpathy, learned Standing Counsel for School
and Mass Education Department contended that in view of
law laid down in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra) although
benefit of compassionate appointment to the legal heirs of
the deceased employees of educational institutions receiving
block grant has already been extended by the State
Government, pursuant to letter dated 01.08.2019, but so
far as other claims as made in this writ application, the
petitioner is not entitled to get the same, as because the
benefit of Grant-in-Aid Order, 1994 was denied by this
Court in State of Odisha v. Sri Lokanath Behera, 2018
(II) OLR 932, which has been confirmed by the apex Court
in Civil Appeal No. 7295 of 2019 arising out of SLP(C) No.
8343 of 2019 disposed of on 16.09.2019.
        Considering the contentions raised by learned counsel
for the parties and after going through the record, this
Court is of the considered view that since the benefit of
compassionate appointment to the legal heirs of deceased
employees of educational institutions receiving block grant
has already been extended by the authority, vide circular
dated    01.08.2019,     therefore,   without    expressing    any
opinion on the merits of the case, the matter is remitted
                                   3




        back to the authority concerned for consideration with
        regard to extension of other benefits as claimed in the writ
        application taking into account the ratio decided in
        Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra) within a period of four
        months from the date of communication of this order.
        Needless to mention, if it is found that the petitioner is
        entitled to get all the benefits, as claimed in the writ
        application in consonance with the law laid down in
        Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra), the same shall be granted
        within the time stipulated.
             The writ petition is thus disposed of.
              As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are
        continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the
        soft copy of this order available in the High Court's website
        or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the
        manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated 25th
        March, 2020.


                                      ..................................

(Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J)

Ajaya

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter