Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 701 Ori
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2021
CRLA No.405 of 2019
1
I.A. No.966 of 2019
1. Dileswar Sabar @ Dora ... Appellants/
Petitioners
2. Debaraj Sabar
-Versus-
State of Odisha ... Respondent/
Opp. party
07. 21.01.2021 The matter is taken up through Video
Conferencing.
This is an application under Section 389 of
Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.
Heard.
The appellants-petitioners have been convicted
under sections 304(I)/452/147/34 of the Indian Penal
Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of seven
years each and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- (two
thousands), in default, to undergo further R.I. for three
months for the offence under section 304(1)/34 of the
Indian Penal Code, R.I. for a period of two years and to
pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- (two thousands), in default, to
undergo further R.I. for one month for the offence under
section 452/34 of the Indian Penal Code and R.I. for a
period of three months for the offence under section
147/34 of the Indian Penal Code by the learned Addl.
Sessions Judge, Paralakhemundi in S.T. Case No.62 of
2017.
Perused the impugned judgment.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted
2
that the petitioners are in judicial custody since
21.10.2016. He further submitted that the doctor's
evidence indicates that the ligature mark which was
present on the front side of the neck was discontinuous
at the backside of the neck and the doctor found no
definite fracture on thyroid, hyoid or cricoid cartilage
which creates doubt about the manner in which the
death took place according to the evidence of the eye
witnesses. He further submitted that there is no
chance of early hearing of appeal in the near future
and balance of convenience is in favour of the
petitioners, and therefore, the bail application of the
petitioners may be favourably considered.
Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand,
opposed the prayer for bail and placed the evidence of
the eye witnesses particularly P.W.9 Smt. Subasini
Sabar, the mother of the deceased and Pitambar Sabar
(P.W.5), who is an independent eye witness. He also
placed the evidence of the doctor (P.W.8), who stated
to have noticed the ligature mark around the neck of
the deceased.
Considering the submissions of learned counsel
for the respective parties, the nature of evidence
adduced by the prosecution during trial, the
substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial
Court, the period already undergone by the petitioners
and absence of any chance of early hearing of the
appeal in the near future, the prayer for bail is allowed.
3
Let the appellants-petitioners be released on bail
pending disposal of the appeal on furnishing bail bond
of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) each with two
local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
The I.A. is disposed of.
.............................
S.K. Sahoo, J.
RKM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!