Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1015 Ori
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021
W.P.(C) No. 2696 of 2021
02. 28.01.2021 The matter is taken up through video conferencing.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction to
the opposite parties no.1 to 4 to fix the pay of the petitioner from
01.08.1997, instead of 01.04.1999, as the petitioner is entitled for
the same and the similarly situated persons like the petitioner
have already been extended the same benefits, in view of the
judgment/order of this Court in the case of Karunakar Biswal v.
State of Orissa and others, Vol.82 (1996) CLT-666, and pay the
differential arrears to the petitioner on such re-fixation within a
stipulated period.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner
states that highlighting the grievance, the petitioner has made
representation to the opposite party no.4 vide Annexure-8, and
direction be given to the said opposite party to consider and
dispose of the same.
In view of the aforesaid limited grievance of the petitioner,
this Court disposes of the writ petition directing the opposite party
no.4 to take a decision on the representation filed by the petitioner
vide Annexure-8 and pass appropriate order in accordance with
law within a period of three months from the date of production of
certified/ authenticated copy of this order by the petitioner.
As COVID-19 pandemic situation is continuing, learned
counsel for the parties may utilize the soft copy of this order
available in the High Court's official website or print out thereof at
par with certified copies in the manner prescribed vide Court's
Notice No.4587 dated 25.03.2020.
...............................
Ajaya (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!