Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1149 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021
W.P.(C) No. 3309 of 2021
02. 01.02.2021 This matter is taken up through video conferencing.
Heard Mr. D.K. Panda, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking direction
to opposite parties no. 1 and 2 to sanction and disburse the
differential arrear salary from 01.06.1992 to 31.05.1995 in the
scale of pay of Rs.1200-2040 in the post of Upper Division Clerk
and from 01.06.1996 in the scale of pay of Rs.1400-2600/- as
Head Clerk.
In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner
states that highlighting the grievances, the petitioner has made
representation to opposite party no.1 vide Annexure-8 and the
same has been communicated to opposite party no.2 vide
Annexure-9, therefore, the same may be directed to be disposed
of in the light of the judgment in Annexure-10 within a stipulated
time.
Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this
Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case,
disposes of the writ petition directing opposite party no.1 to
consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-
8 in the light of the judgment of this Court in Annexure-10 and
pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of
three months from the date of production of
authenticated/certified copy of this order.
As the restrictions due to the COVID-19 situation are
continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft
copy of this order available in the High Court's website or print
out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner prescribed,
vide Court's Notice No.4587, dated 25th March, 2020.
Ajaya
..................................
(Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J)
Ajaya
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!