Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

WP(C)/32771/2020
2021 Latest Caselaw 1119 Ori

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1119 Ori
Judgement Date : 1 February, 2021

Orissa High Court
WP(C)/32771/2020 on 1 February, 2021
                                W.P.(C) No.32771 of 2020




5.   01.02.2021           This matter is taken up through Video Conferencing
                  because of COVID-19 Pandemic.

                          Heard Mr. Somanath Mishra, learned counsel         for the
                  petitioner,   Mr.Ajodhya    Ranjan    Das,   learned   counsel    for
                  opposite party nos.1       and 2 and Mr.Sanjay Kumar Mishra,
                  learned counsel for opposite party no.4.

                          The   petitioner-Union   is   a   registered   Union     duly
                  registered under the Trade Unions Act,1926 and its General
                  Secretary calls in question the fee structure of V.S. Vidyalaya
                  by the opposite parties for the year 2020-21 in spite of fee hike
                  in the year 2018-19 and 2019-20 and further the petitioner has
                  challenged the action of the opposite parties regarding Minutes
                  of the meeting held on 18.08.2020 pursuant to the order dated
                  14.07.2020 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.15040 of 2020.

                          In the instant case, the petitioner has sought for
                  quashing of Annexure-10 and allow the parents to pay the
                  school fees on the basis of 2019-20 fees structure and refund
                  the excess amount already deducted from the salary till the
                  next academic year.

                          A counter affidavit has been filed by opposite party nos.3
                  and 4     wherein it has been stated that such fees hike, as
                  demonstrated vide Annexure-10 is around 20% and so far as

Gs
                  common judgment of this Court dated 07.01.2021 passed in
                  W.P.(C) No.11299 of 2020 and other cases, which was passed
                  based on the report of       the Principal Secretary, School and
                  Mass Education Department, which demonstrates as to the
                  percentage of tuition fees or composite fees waiver percentage
                   2




as per slab,     the composite revised fees structure of the
opposite party no.4 Society either comes under sl.no.3 or 4 i.e.,
in between the slab of Rs.12,100/- to Rs.24,000/- and/or
Rs.24,001 to Rs.48,000/- per annum and in terms of the said
Minutes of Meeting/MOU, which is not applicable to the
opposite party, it should have revised/reduced the said
enhanced fees by 12% and 15% respectively as per the fees
structure/slab   applicable   to   the   students   of   the   said
institution. Rather, as may be seen from the Minutes of
Meeting dated 18.08.2020 i.e., Annexure-9, which well reflects
that the notified fees hike has been brought down to
approximately 20% from 40% for the Academic Year 2020-21
vide notification no.17.07.2020.

       Further in the counter affidavit filed by opposite party
nos.3 and 4 it is stated that while disposing of the said batch of
writ petitions vide common judgment dated 07.01.2021, this
Court, vide paragraph-30 of the said judgment observed as
follows :

             "Neverthless, it must be clarified that while
            this Court has recorded the fact of the MOU
            having been entered into, this will not
            preclude individual institutions or parties
            who may be aggrieved or who may have a
            different point of view than that recorded in
            the MOU, or seeks strict enforcement of the
            terms and conditions of recognition or grant
            of NOC as set out in the resolution dated 23rd
            September,1996 from seeking appropriate
                         3




              reliefs       in    separate     proceedings        as     are
              permissible to them in accordance with law."

         Further in the said counter affidavit it is stated that in
paragraph-30       of       the   said    judgment,   finally     this    Court
concluded that in the result of the said writ applications, all
pending applications pertaining to the said issue also stand
disposed of in terms of the said judgment. Hence, the present
writ application filed by the petitioner Union is also deemed to
be disposed of in the light of the common judgment dated
07.1.2021 passed in W.P.(C) No.11299 of 2020 and other
cases.

         After hearing learned counsel for the respective parties
and in view of the judgment dated 07.01.2021 passed by this
Court in W.P.(C) No.11299 of 2020 and other cases, this writ
petition is disposed of in terms of the judgment dated
07.01.2021 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.11299 of 2020 .

         Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

         As   restrictions        are    continuing   due    to    COVID-19
Pandemic, learned counsel for the parties may utilize the soft
copy of this order available in the High Court's official website
or print out thereof at par with certified copies in the manner
prescribed, vide Court's notice dated 4587 dated 25.03.2020.


                                                 .........................
                                                  P. Patnaik, J.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter