Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tanda Digal vs State Of Odisha
2021 Latest Caselaw 12544 Ori

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12544 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 December, 2021

Orissa High Court
Tanda Digal vs State Of Odisha on 6 December, 2021
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

                            CRLA No. 755 of 2018

              Tanda Digal                            ....      Appellant/
                                                              Petitioner

                                    Mr. Manas Chand, Advocate

                                          -versus-
              State of Odisha                        ....   Respondent/
                                                            Opp. Party

                                    Mr. R.K. Tripathy,
                                    Addl. Standing Counsel
                                     CORAM:

                                 JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

                                       ORDER

Order No. 06.12.2021

I.A. No.781 of 2021

05. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode).

This is an application under Section 389 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail.

Heard Mr. Manas Chand, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R.K. Tripathy, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State of Odisha.

The appellant-petitioner has been convicted under section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the N.D.P.S. Act and sentenced to undergo R.I. for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh), in default, to undergo further R.I. for a period of six months by the // 2 //

learned Additional Sessions Judge, Balliguda in 2(a) CC No.01 of 2017(T) (T.R. No.02 of 2018).

Perused the impugned judgment.

As per the order dated 29.11.2021, learned counsel for the petitioner has filed the written note of submissions giving copy thereof to Mr. Tripathy. Several points have been highlighted in the written note of arguments to show that there are good chances of success in the appeal and balance of convenience is in favour of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner placed the grounds and also the relevant evidence of the witnesses. It is further stated that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 23.08.2017 and therefore, out of ten years of substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial Court, he has already undergone substantive sentence of more than four years and three months and there is no chance of early hearing of appeal in the near future and therefore, the bail application of the petitioner may be favourably considered.

Learned counsel for the State, on the other hand, opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the learned trial Court has dealt with the points raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the impugned judgment and there is no infirmity or illegality in the impugned judgment.

At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to prepare and file the required number of paper books

// 3 //

whereafter the matter can be heard at an earliest on merit.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the respective parties, the nature of evidence adduced by the prosecution during trial, the commercial quantity of ganja seized and bar under section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act, which is also to be taken into account at the stage of deciding the bail application in the appellate stage, while not inclining to release the petitioner on bail on merit, but taking into account the sentence imposed by the learned trial Court, the period that has already undergone by the petitioner, absence of any chance of early hearing of the appeal in the near future, I direct the petitioner to be released on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of his release. The petitioner shall surrender before the learned Court below immediately on the expiry of the said three months period.

For the aforesaid period, let the appellant-petitioner be released on interim bail for the aforesaid period on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two local solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court in seisin over the matter with further terms and conditions as the learned Court may deem just and proper. While on interim bail, the petitioner shall not try to indulge in any criminal activities in any manner and he shall appear before the Inspector in-charge of Balliguda police station once in a week on every Sunday in between 10.00 a.m. to 4.00 p.m. While on interim bail, every endeavour shall be

// 4 //

made by the petitioner to prepare the paper books and file it.

Violation of any terms and conditions shall entail cancellation of interim bail.

The I.A. is disposed of.

A free copy of this order be handed over to the learned counsel for the State.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge

CRLA No.755 of 2018

06. List this matter in the week commencing from 21.03.2022.

Learned counsel for the appellant shall file the surrender certificate of the appellant by the next date.

(S.K. Sahoo) Judge RKM

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter