Ratnakar Sahu vs Govt. Of India And Others
2021 Latest Caselaw 8372 Ori

       IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
                            W.P.(C) No. 23227 of 2021

Ratnakar Sahu                                 .....                      Petitioner
                                                        Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate
                                        Vs.
Govt. of India and others                     .....                  Opposite parties


            CORAM:
                DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

                                          ORDER

10.08.2021 W.P.(C) No. 23227 of 2021 And I.A. No.10706 of 2021 Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition to quash Annexure-6 issued by opposite party no.3-Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Bhubaneswar by which direction has been issued for stoppage of pension on higher wages so far as the petitioners are concerned.

Mr. S. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, stated that the reasons for stoppage of pension on higher wages are based on the judgment of the apex Court in R.C. Gupta v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Employees Provident Fund Organisation, SLP (C) Nos.33032-33033 of 2015, which has been disposed of vide order dated 04.10.2016 under Annexure-4. He has placed reliance on paragraphs-11 and 12 of the said judgment and contended that if the petitioner deposits the required amount, then he would be brought into the pension scheme. Accordingly, in compliance of the said judgment, the petitioner has deposited the requisite amounts, which have been acknowledged vide Annexure-2 series. Thereafter, pension scheme has been extended to the petitioner, but all on a sudden, without complying the aforesaid judgment, opposite party no.3 by misinterpreting the judgment in R.C. Gupta (supra) vide Annexure-6 has directed for stoppage of pension on higher wages, which are absolutely illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of law.

In the opinion of this Court, the matter requires consideration. Issue notice to the opposite parties by speed post fixing a short returnable date, requisites for which shall be filed within three days.

As an interim measure, it is directed that the order passed by opposite party no.3-Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner (Pension), Bhubaneswar in Annexure-6, so far as petitioner is concerned, shall not be given effect to till 31.08.2021.

Put up this matter along with W.P.(C) No.32350 of 2020. Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Ashok (DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE