Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 8150 Ori
Judgement Date : 4 August, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
MACA No.399 of 2020
Divisional Manager (Legal), New ..... Appellant
India Assurance Com.Ltd.
Mr.G.P.Dutta, Advocate
- Versus-
Indumati Chhatria and others. ..... Respondents
A.K.Rout, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE BISWANATH RATH
ORDER
04.08.2021
Order No. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.
10.
2. This appeal involves challenge to the judgment of the learned 3rd Additional District Judge-cum-4th M.A.C.T., Cuttack in M.A.C.Case No.312 of 2014/ 356 of 2017 mainly on the ground Nos.4 & 5 herein. Advancing his submission, Sri Dutta, learned counsel appearing for the Insurance Company submitted for the plea of the parties and material disclosure there is apparent error in so far as calculation on the monthly gross income of the deceased further absolute silence by the tribunal on adjustment on account of Income Tax looking to the monthly income of the deceased. RKS Therefore, a contention is raised by Sri Dutta that looking to the valuation to the matter, the observation of the Tribunal so far it relates to wage aspect is concerned should be interfered as a consequence the compensation should also be modified accordingly.
2. On the contrary, Sri Sahoo, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that looking to the plea and the evidence of respective parties, there remains no doubt in the calculation aspect on monthly wage of the deceased involved. Sri Sahoo claimed there is absolutely no error in the calculation by the tribunal requiring any interference in the same.
3. Considering the rival contentions of the parties, this Court here finds since the gross salary of the deceased exceeded Rs.6,00,000/- taking into account the salary of a particular year, stand of Insurance Company that tax liability should have been taken into account, finds force. In the entire discussion on the wage aspect and to arrive in the ultimate compensation, this Court finds the learned Tribunal has not at all taken into account the tax burden involving the income of the deceased involved here particularly from the point of view of high income group employee involved herein.
4. Taking into consideration the tax involvement, demonstrated by the Insurance Company at paragraph-5 of the memorandum of appeal considering the tax as a statutory tax and employees are earning such high wages must be paying tax, this Court instead of remitting the matter for reconsideration of the compensation taking into account the tax components involved herein, finds a flat deduction of Rs.7,50,000/- will serve the purpose. This Court therefore interfering in the award of Rs.52,93,000/- reduces the same to Rs.45,43,000/-. The claimant shall also be entitled to interest at the rate of 6% over and above the reduced compensation granted by this Court and further the other conditions of the Tribunal shall also be maintained, but in appropriate proportionate.
5. This court also takes up the plea on the default interest being awarded by the Tribunal, for a legal battle exemption of being taken up by the Insurance Company and ultimately the appeal being allowed in interference in the award involved herein, there should not be any direction on penal interest. Upon deposit of the entire amount in the trial court within one and half month, receipt being filed in this Court, Registry shall make arrangement for refund of the statutory deposit deposited by the Insurance company along with any interest accrued thereon as on the date of release.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the appeal stands disposed of.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order on proper application.
(BISWANATH RATH) JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!