Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

2 06.04.2021 The Matter Is Taken Up ... vs Unknown
2021 Latest Caselaw 4632 Ori

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4632 Ori
Judgement Date : 6 April, 2021

Orissa High Court
2 06.04.2021 The Matter Is Taken Up ... vs Unknown on 6 April, 2021
                                WP(C) NO.11497 of 2021                              1




02   06.04.2021           The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.
                          Heard Mr. Satyajit Samal, learned counsel for the
                  petitioner and Mr. B. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel
                  for School and Mass Education Department.
                          The petitioner has filed this application seeking
                  direction to the opposite parties to treat the petitioner at
                  par with the employees of other aided educational
                  institutions, who have been extended with grant-in-aid in
                  accordance      with     Grant-in-Aid   Order,   1994,      and
                  accordingly extend all benefits as applicable to the aided
                  educational institutions within the meaning of Section
                  3(b) of the Orissa Education Act, such as Earned Leaves
                  as prescribed under Rule 9 of 1977 Rules, extra ordinary
                  leaves as prescribed under Rule 12 of 1977 Rules, as well
                  as study leaves as prescribed under Rule 13 of 1977
                  Rules and other benefits as provided under 1977 Rules,
                  Pension Rules, GPF Rules, though the same facilities and
                  benefits were given to the employees of other institutions,
                  which were notified under Section 3(b) of the Orissa
                  Education Act, 1969 pursuant to Grant-in-Aid Order,
                  1994.
                          Mr.   Satyajit   Samal,   learned   counsel   for   the
                  petitioner has contended that since the petitioner is
                  working in an educational institution receiving block
                  grant, in view of the judgment passed in Ritanjali Giri @
                  Paul v. State of Odisha (School & M.E. Deptt.) &
                  others, 2016 (I) ILR-1162 wherein this Court has already
                  held that the legal heirs of deceased employees of
                                                                  2




educational institutions receiving block grant are entitled
to get compassionate appointment, pursuant to which the
Government of Odisha in the Department of School &
Mass Education has issued a circular on 01.08.2019
granting benefit of compassionate appointment to the
legal heirs of the deceased employees working in fully
aided     educational      institutions   and    educational
institutions   receiving   grant-in-aid   (New)/block   grant,
therefore, other benefits as claimed in the writ application
should be extended to the petitioners.
        Mr. B. Mohanty, learned Standing Counsel for
School and Mass Education Department contended that
in view of law laid down in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra)
although benefit of compassionate appointment to the
legal heirs of the deceased employees of educational
institutions receiving block grant has already been
extended by the State Government, pursuant to letter
dated 01.08.2019, but so far as other claims as made in
this writ application, the petitioner is not entitled to get
the same, as because the benefit of Grant-in-Aid Order,
1994 was denied by this Court in State of Odisha v. Sri
Lokanath Behera, 2018 (II) OLR 932, which has been
confirmed by the apex Court in Civil Appeal No. 7295 of
2019 arising out of SLP(C) No. 8343 of 2019 disposed of
on 16.09.2019.
        Considering the contentions raised by learned
counsel for the parties and after going through the record,
this Court is of the considered view that since the benefit
                                                                         3




        of compassionate appointment to the legal heirs of
        deceased employees of educational institutions receiving
        block grant has already been extended by the authority,
        vide   circular   dated   01.08.2019,    therefore,   without
        expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the
        matter is remitted back to the authority concerned for
        consideration with regard to extension of other benefits as
        claimed in the writ application taking into account the
        ratio decided in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra) within a
        period of four months from the date of communication of
        this order.   Needless to mention, if it is found that the
        petitioner is entitled to get all the benefits, as claimed in
        the writ application in consonance with the law laid down
        in Ritanjali Giri @ Paul (supra), the same shall be
        granted within the time stipulated.
               The writ petition is thus disposed of.
               As the restrictions due to COVID-19 situation are
        continuing, learned counsel for the parties may utilize a
        soft copy of this order available in the High Court's
        website or print out thereof at par with certified copy in
        the manner prescribed, vide Court's Notice No.4587,
        dated 25th March, 2020.



                                       .............................. ...
                                       Dr. B.R. Sarangi, J.

Ashok

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter