Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 504 Mani
Judgement Date : 27 August, 2025
Digitally signed by
Serial No. 17
KHOIROM KHOIROM
BIPINCHAN BIPINCHANDRA
SINGH
DRA SINGH Date: 2025.08.27
16:58:38 +05'30'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
CONT. CAS(C) No. 67 of 2025
AS Ringnam
... Petitioner
- Versus -
Namoijam Kheda Varta & 2 Ors.
... Respondents
B E F O R E
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K. SOMASHEKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA
O R D E R
[K. Somashekar, CJ] 27.08.2025 This contempt petition has been initiated by the complainant
for willful disobedience of the order rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench in
W.A. No. 10 of 2020 dated 19.07.2024.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Kh.
Tarunkumar is present before this Court physically.
Similarly, learned counsel for the respondent No. 3, Mr. S.
Suresh is present before this Court physically.
Whereas, learned Government Advocate for the respondents
No. 1 & 2, Mr. RK Umakanta is present before this Court physically in this
matter and is submitting an order dated 26.08.2025 passed by the
Government of Manipur, Secretariat : Land Resource Department whereby
consisting of paragraphs No. 1 to 13, wherein paragraph 12 of this order
indicates that -
Page 1|2 "12. Now therefore, considering the above and in conformity with the Court orders, it is hereby conveyed the approval of the Government to refund the deducted amount of Rs. 22,589/- and also to prepare payment of the monthly pension @ Rs. 5390/- p.m. to A.S. Ringam (Retd.) Lambu of SDO, Chingai, Ukhrul District, Manipur in pursuance of the Judgment and Order of Hon'ble High Court of Manipur dated 19th December, 2019 passed in W.P.(C) no. 282 of 2014, Order dated 19th July, 2024 passed in W.A. No. 10 of 2020 and Order of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dated 1st August, 2025 passed in Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No
(s). 36571 of 2025 at the earliest."
However, keeping in view of the order rendered by the
Government of Manipur dated 26.08.2025 in pursuance of the order
rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench in the aforesaid writ appeal has been
complied with.
Accordingly, the present contempt petition does not have any
substance for consideration and consequently, the present contempt
petition stands closed.
JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bipin
Page 2|2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!