Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 112 Mani
Judgement Date : 22 March, 2024
IN. 67
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
MC(Review Pet.) No. 4 of 2024
Union of India & anr. ... Applicant/s
Vs.
S A Rojan Zimik ... Respondents/s
B E F O R E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
22-03-2024
Heard Mr. S. Samarjeet, learned senior panel counsel
appearing for the applicants and Mr. Serto T. Kom, learned counsel
appearing for the respondent.
The present application has been filed with a prayer for
correcting the typographical error which occurred at paragraph No. 11(a)
of the judgment and order dated 11-01-2024 passed by this Court in
Revision Petition No. 13 of 2017. It has been submitted by the learned
counsel appearing for the applicants that in the paragraph No. 11 (a) of
the said judgment and order, the year of the writ petition, i.e. "WP(C) No.
322 of 2023" should read as "WP(C) No. 322 of 2013".
Mr. Serto T. Kom, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent also endorsed the submission made by Mr. S. Samarjeet,
learned senior panel counsel appearing for the applicants.
In view of the submission made by the learned counsel
appearing for the parties, it is hereby ordered that the writ petition being "WP(C) No. 322 of 2023" mentioned at paragraph 11(a) of the aforesaid
judgment and order should read as "WP(C) No. 322 of 2013".
With the aforesaid directions, the present application is
disposed of.
JUDGE
Dhakeshori LAISHRAM Digitally LAISHRAM signed by
DHAKESH DHAKESHORI DEVI Date: 2024.03.22 ORI DEVI 15:37:59 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!