Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

K.Sait Mohammed vs The Agricultural Production ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 203 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 203 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

K.Sait Mohammed vs The Agricultural Production ... on 19 January, 2026

Author: S.M.Subramaniam
Bench: S.M.Subramaniam
    2026:MHC:202


                                                                                               W.A.No.1225 of 2022
                                                                                               ---------------------------
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                                       DATED: 19.01.2026
                                                               CORAM:
                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                                    AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

                                                     W.A.No. 1225 of 2022


                K.Sait Mohammed                                                              ...Appellant

                                                                    Vs.

                1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner &
                  The Principal Secretary to Government,
                  Agricultural Department,
                  Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

                2.The Director of Agriculture,
                  Chennai – 600 005.

                3.The Joint Director of Agriculture,
                  Trichirapalli – 600 005.                                                   ...Respondents


                PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying
                to set aside the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.6783 of 2014 dated
                17.12.2020 with costs.

                                   For Appellant          : Mr.M.Vijaya Kumar

                                   For Respondents : Mr.Haja Nazirudeen,

                                                            Addl. Advocate General

                                                            assisted by Mr.M.Rajendiran,

                                                            Addl. Govt. Pleader

                                                                *********
                1/6


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 21/01/2026 03:10:17 pm )
                                                                                        W.A.No.1225 of 2022
                                                                                        ---------------------------
                                                    JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

Under assail is the writ order dated 17.12.2020 passed in W.P.No.6783

of 2014.

2. The writ petitioner is the appellant before this Court. The cause

arose for filing of the Writ Petition in view of the order passed by the

Government vide letter dated 22.08.2013. A perusal of the said Government

letter would show that the petitioner filed W.P.No.32877 of 2012 to dispose of

his representation dated 12.08.2012. The High Court passed an order

directing the Government to consider the representation dated 12.08.2012

and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a

period of eight weeks. Subsequently the impugned order in Writ proceedings

dated 22.08.2013 came to be issued.

3. A reading of the said Government letter would reveal that the

appellant was appointed as Agricultural Officer on 24.10.1983. A charge

memo was issued on 26.04.1991. The disciplinary proceedings ended with an

order of punishment on 27.11.1997 imposing a punishment of stoppage of

increment for two years without cumulative effect for which currency of

punishment lasted from 01.07.1998 to 30.06.2000. In view of the currency of

punishment, Selection Grade was not awarded to the appellant. However,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/01/2026 03:10:17 pm )

---------------------------

subsequently Selection Grade was awarded to the appellant with effect from

01.01.2001 by the Commissioner of Agriculture.

4. With reference to issuance of charge memo and imposition of

punishment, the learned Additional Advocate General would submit that the

present Writ Appeal is second round of litigation. The writ petitioner earlier

filed Writ Petition in W.P.No.24114 of 2006 challenging the Government letter

dated 10.04.2006 and to grant Selection Grade to the appellant retrospectively

with effect from 24.10.1993, if not atleast from 01.01.1994, the date on which

the appellant completed 10 years of service from his initial date of

appointment.

5. The Writ Petition was disposed of with a direction that the appellant

was not given annual increment even after completion of punishment period,

the 2nd respondent is bound to consider and sanction the increment. The

appellant was permitted to make a representation before the Director of

Agriculture within a period of two weeks and the said representation was

directed to be considered. Not satisfied with the above Writ order, the

appellant herein filed Writ Appeal in W.A.No.2270 of 2011. The Division

Bench has passed final orders on 10.12.2011 affirming the order of the writ

Court dated 02.08.2010. The Division Bench has recorded that the

punishment imposed remained effective till the year 2000 on account of

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/01/2026 03:10:17 pm )

---------------------------

currency of punishment, Selection Grade benefit was granted to the appellant

with effect from 01.01.2001. Thus the issue reached finality at that point of

time. Therefore, submitting further representation may not arise at all. The

petitioner reached the age of superannuation on 31.01.2019 and allowed to

retire from service.

6. Once the issues have reached finality, reopening the same issue by

submitting representation, securing orders from the writ Court to dispose of

the representation would result in multiplicity of proceedings and would not

serve to the cause of justice. If at all the person is aggrieved from any order of

the Writ Court or the Writ Appellate Court, he has to prefer an appeal and not

representation after some time. Re-litigating the issue is opposed to the

principles of law.

7. Even on merits, in the present case, the petitioner was appointed in

the year 1983 and charge memo was issued in the year 1991, which ended

with an order of punishment. The punishment became final and the currency

of punishment was taken into consideration for grant of Selection Grade.

However, subsequently benefit of Selection Grade was granted in 2001, which

was confirmed by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.2270 of

2011 dated 10.12.2011. That being the factum, the present litigation is nothing

but a re-litigation, which deserves no merit consideration.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/01/2026 03:10:17 pm )

---------------------------

8. Consequently, the writ order in W.P.No.6783 of 2014 dated

17.12.2020 stands confirmed and the Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs.

                                                                               (S.M.S., J.)     (C.K., J.)
                                                                                      19.01.2026
                dsa
                Index            :Yes/No
                Neutral Citation :Yes/No
                Speaking/Non-speaking order



                To

1.The Agricultural Production Commissioner & The Principal Secretary to Government, Agricultural Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

2.The Director of Agriculture, Chennai – 600 005.

3.The Joint Director of Agriculture, Trichirapalli – 600 005.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/01/2026 03:10:17 pm )

---------------------------

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.

dsa

19.01.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 21/01/2026 03:10:17 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter