Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 166 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2026
W.P.No.49768 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09.01.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY
W.P.No.49768 of 2025
T.Thegaleesan ... Petitioner
-vs-
The Joint Sub Registrar No.1,
Villupuram. ... Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
records of the respondent in RFL/No.1 Joint Sub Registrar,
Villupuram/78/2025 dated 03.12.2025 and quash the same and thereby direct
the respondent to register the sale deed in favour of petitioner dated
01.12.2025 in respect of the property situate at Dry S.No.13 New
S.No.13/1A1A1A measuring an extent of 1200 sq.ft with 400 sq.ft
superstructure therein at Kakuppam Village, Villupuram Taluk.
1/4
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 01:37:33 pm )
W.P.No.49768 of 2025
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Suresh
For Respondent : Ms.Akila Rajendran
Government Advocate
**********
ORDER
The petitioner’s mother executed a sale deed in favour of the
petitioner. Upon presentation for registration, the request was declined
under the impugned refusal check slip.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order
is unsustainable in as much as the existence of a prior mortgage is cited as
the reason for refusal. By relying on the judgment of this Court in Federal
Bank Limited v. Sub Registrar and others 2023(2) CTC 289, learned counsel
submits that the registering officer is not entitled to refuse registration on the
ground of the existence of a mortgage.
3. Ms.Akila Rajendran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice
for the respondent.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 01:37:33 pm )
4. The existence of a prior mortgage is not a ground for refusal of
registration of a conveyance. Such conveyance would, however, be subject
to the rights of the mortgagee under the prior mortgage. In addition, it has
been held in several judgments, including T.Gopi v. The Inspector General
of Registration, that the registering officer does not have the power to
adjudicate on title, including with reference to Rule 55A of the Registration
Rules, which was struck down in the said judgment.
5. For reasons aforesaid, the impugned order cannot be sustained and
is hereby set aside. Consequently, the petitioner is permitted to re-present
the instrument for registration. Subject to fulfilment of other requirements
such as payment of stamp duty and registration fees, the instrument shall be
registered within two weeks from the date of re-presentation thereof.
6. This writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs.
09.01.2026 rna Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation: Yes / No
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 01:37:33 pm )
SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY,J
rna
To
The Joint Sub Registrar No.1, Villupuram.
09.01.2026
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 01:37:33 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!