Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Senthamilselvi vs M/S.R.B.S.Readymix Concrete
2026 Latest Caselaw 146 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 146 Mad
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

R.Senthamilselvi vs M/S.R.B.S.Readymix Concrete on 9 January, 2026

Author: P.Velmurugan
Bench: P.Velmurugan
                                                                                        C.M.A.(MD)No.901 of 2021


                          BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                            Reserved on                    : 14.11.2025

                                            Pronounced on                  : 09.01.2026

                                                         CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

                                                             and

                                  THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI

                                            C.M.A.(MD)No.901 of 2021
                    1.R.Senthamilselvi

                    2.P.Arivalagan

                    3.S.P.A.Hemaltha                                           ... Appellants / Petitioners


                                                              Vs.

                    1.M/s.R.B.S.Readymix Concrete,
                      No.1/29, Srimathi Complex,
                      Pudukottai Main Road,
                      T.V.S. Tollgate,
                      Tiruchirappalli-620 005.
                                                                     ... Respondent / 1st Respondent

                    2.Assistant Manager,
                      M/s.National Insurance Company Ltd.,
                      KRT Building, 1st Floor,
                      33, Bharadhidasan Road,
                      Promenade Road, Cartontment,
                      Trichy-620 001.
                                                      ... Respondent /2nd Respondent

                    (In respect of R-1, Issuance of Notice is dispensed
                    with, as R-1 remained exparte before the Tribunal,
                    vide Court order dated 07.02.2022 made in C.M.A.
                    (MD)No.901 of 2021)


                    1/9



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )
                                                                                         C.M.A.(MD)No.901 of 2021


                    PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the
                    Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to modify by enhancing the award passed in
                    and made in M.C.O.P.No.1381 of 2016 on the file of the learned Special
                    District Judge for MCOP cases, Tiruchirappalli, dated 07.10.2020.

                                         For Appellant             : Mr.Shangar Murali

                                         For R-1                   : Dispensed with

                                         For R-2                   : Mr.J.S.Murali


                                                         JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.)

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the award

passed in M.C.O.P.No.1381 of 2016 on the file of the learned Special

District Judge for MCOP cases, Tiruchirappalli, dated 07.10.2020.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred as

per their ranking before the learned Tribunal.

3. The facts of the Case required for the disposal of the

appeal in nutshell are as follows:

On 23.07.2016, Dr. Ashok was returning from the temple on his

two-wheeler bearing registration No. TN 45 AU 8659. A Tata 407

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

concrete mixer lorry bearing registration No. TN 45 AQ 5232 was driven

by its driver rashly and negligently, and hit the two-wheeler ridden by

Dr. Ashok. As a result of the accident, Dr. Ashok sustained multiple

injuries and was immediately taken to the Trichy Government Hospital,

where he was admitted for treatment. However, despite treatment, he

succumbed to his injuries at about 10.00 p.m. the same night. The

accident occurred on the Trichy-Chennai Bypass Road, opposite

Sangeetha Hotel, and was reported to the police. A case in Crime No.

180 of 2016 was registered under Sections 279 and 304(A) IPC. At the

time of the accident, the deceased Dr. Ashok was 25 years old and was

working as a Government doctor, earning a monthly income of Rs.

5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only). Hence, the parents and sister of

the deceased have filed a claim petition seeking Rs. 2,00,00,000/-

(Rupees Two Crores only) as compensation with 12% interest per

annum from the owner of the vehicle and the insurer.

3. In order to prove the case of the claimants, before the learned

Tribunal, the claimants were examined as P.W-1 to P.W-3 and Exhibits

P-1 to P-21 were marked. R.W-1 was examined and Ex.R-1 and Ex.R-2

were marked on the side of the respondents. Two Court documents were

marked.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

4. Upon considering the oral and documentary evidence, the

learned Tribunal had come to the conclusion that the accident had

occurred solely due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the

1st respondent. Based on the oral and documentary evidence let in

before the learned Tribunal, an amount of Rs.71,83,356/- (Rupees

Seventy-One Lakhs Eighty-Three Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty-

Six only) has been awarded towards compensation and the 2nd

respondent Insurance company was directed to pay compensation0

along with 7.5% interest per annum including Advocate fee of Rs.

1,50,185/- (Rupees One Lakh Fifty Thousand One Hundred and Eighty

Five only) from the date of the impugned order within a period of two (2)

months from the date of the said order. Assailing the same, the

appellant is before this Court.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the appellants contend that

the learned Tribunal's judgment and decree are contrary to law,

evidence, and probabilities, and would lead to a failure of justice. He

argued that the learned Tribunal overlooked the deceased's

qualifications, career prospects, and salary as a primary health duty

doctor, supported by 21 documents and oral evidence. He further

argued that the learned Trial Court overlooked crucial facts about the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

deceased's career prospects, including his selection for M.D.

(Anesthesia) and his pursuit of becoming a cardiologist. The appellants

claimed the learned tribunal erred in limiting future prospects to 50%,

citing the Hon'ble Apex Court's decision in Sarla Verma vs Delhi

Transport Corporation, which considers future prospects for

individuals with stable jobs. Hence, The learned counsel appearing for

the appellants claim the compensation awarded is inadequate and seek

to justify their claim of Rs. 2,00,00,000/- (Two Crores).

6. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the 2 nd

respondent would submit that the learned Tribunal, after analyzing the

age, avocation, and dependency of the family members, had rightly

come to the conclusion and had awarded compensation as stated above,

which are found to be just and reasonable and hence, prays for

dismissal.

7. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the

materials available on record.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

8. A careful perusal of the materials available on record would

reveal that the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.30,000/-

(Rupees Thirty Thousand only) each towards filial consortium, which is

meagre. Hence, it is modified as Rs.40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand

only) each. Therefore, a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- (Rupees One Lakh

Twenty Thousand only), is awarded as a compensation for loss of filial

consortium.

9. Considering all the above circumstances, the award passed by

the Tribunal is modified as follows:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

S. Description Amount Amount Award awarded by the awarded by this confirmed No. Tribunal Court or enhanced Rs. Rs.

1. Loss of Rs.70,66,356/- Rs.70,66,356/- confirmed dependency

2. Transport Rs. 7,000/- Rs. 7,000/- confirmed expenses

3. Filial Rs. 90,000/- Rs. 1,20,000/- enhanced consortium

Rs.30,000 each = Rs.30,000 x 3

4. Funeral Rs. 10,000/- Rs. 10,000/- confirmed expenses

5. Loss of estate Rs. 10,000/- Rs. 10,000/- confirmed

Total Rs.71,83,356/- Rs.72,13,356/- enhanced

10. In the result, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is partly allowed

and the compensation awarded by the Tribunal at Rs.71,83,356/-

(Rupees Seventy-One Lakhs Eighty-Three Thousand Three Hundred and

Fifty-Six only) is hereby enhanced to Rs.72,13,356/- (Rupees Seventy

Two Lakhs Thirteen Thousand Three Hundred and Fifty-Six only).

11. The 2nd respondent / Insurance Company is directed to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

deposit the compensation amount awarded by this Court with accrued

interest and costs to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.1381 of 2016 on the file of

the learned Special District Judge for MCOP cases, Tiruchirappalli,

within a period of eight weeks (8) from the date of receipt of copy of this

judgment, less the amount, if any already deposited. On such deposit,

the claimants are permitted to withdraw the said amount, less the

amount, if any already withdrawn, by making necessary application

before the Tribunal. The appellant is directed to pay the necessary

Court fee on the enhanced compensation, if any. No costs.

                                                                         [P.V.,J.]       [L.V.G.,J.]

                                                                                  09.01.2026


                    NCC : Yes / No
                    Index : Yes / No
                    Internet : Yes
                    Sml

                    To

The Special District Judge for MCOP cases, Tiruchirappalli.

Copy to

The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

P.VELMURUGAN, J.,

AND

L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.,

Sml

09.01.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/01/2026 03:20:32 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter