Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 843 Mad
Judgement Date : 26 February, 2026
WP No. 6902 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 26-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
WP No. 6902 of 2026
and W.M.P.Nos.7519 & 7523 of 2026
Ms .Sans Electric Energy
represented by its Partner Rajini Murali No.115
Pillaiyar Koil Street, Kaveri Rabjan Nagar,
Saligramam, Chennai - 600 093.
..Petitioner(s)
Vs
The Assistant Commissioner (ST)
Saligramam Assessment circle
No.46 Greenways Road
chennai-600 028
..Respondent(s)
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the respondent in
his proceedings in GSTIN 33ADAFS5526L1ZZ/ 2021-22,quash the order dated
07.11.2025 passed therein.
For Petitioner(s): Mr. Subramanian C
For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, Government Advocate
ORDER
Heard Mr.C.Subramanian, the learned counsel for the petitioner and
Mr.V.Prashan Kiran, the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf o
the respondent.
__________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 07:27:14 pm )
2. This Writ Petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself
with the consent of the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned
Government Advocate for the Respondent.
3. The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated
07.11.2025 in Form GST DRC – 07 passed for the tax period 2021-2022
whereby, the proposal in Show Cause Notice dated 25.06.2025 in Form GST
DRC - 01, has been confirmed against the petitioner pursuant to the reply filed
by the petitioner in Form GST DRC – 06 dated 19.05.2025 and 30.08.2025.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the demand
has been confirmed by the impugned order despite the petitioner filing a
categorical reply on merits on 30.08.2025. It is further submitted that the defect
was purely on account of Input Tax Credit availed, on account of the
cancellation of GST registration of the supplier.
5. It is further submitted that during the period in dispute, the supplier had
not only filed the return in GSTR – 1 but also in GSTR – 3B. Therefore, it is
stated that the Input Tax Credit was validly availed on the strength of the
supplies from the aforesaid supplier. It is further submitted that it has not been
considered by the respondent.
__________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 07:27:14 pm )
6. It is noticed that the petitioner has also filed an application on
21.01.2026 under Section 161 of the respective GST Enactments which has not
evoked any response.
7. The learned Government Advocate for the respondent submitted that
the petitioner’s aforesaid application will be considered and disposed on merits.
8. Recording the same, the respondent is directed to dispose of the
aforesaid application of the petitioner filed for rectification of the impugned
order dated 07.11.2025, on merits, within a period of 30 days from today.
9. This Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation. No costs.
Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
26-02-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No
Note of Office: Issue order copy by today.
BKN
To:
The Assistant Commissioner (ST) Saligramam Assessment circle No.46 Greenways Road chennai-600 028 __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 07:27:14 pm )
C.SARAVANAN, J.
BKN
26-02-2026
__________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 26/02/2026 07:27:14 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!