Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Umar Farook vs State Rep By The Sub-Inspector Police
2026 Latest Caselaw 1817 Mad

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1817 Mad
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Madras High Court

Umar Farook vs State Rep By The Sub-Inspector Police on 10 April, 2026

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                        DATED : 10.04.2026

                                                             CORAM

                                  THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN

                                                   Crl.O.P.No.9099 of 2026

                   Umar Farook                                                     ... Petitioner(s)

                                                               Vs.

                   State rep. by the Sub Inspector of Police,
                   Valapady Police Station,
                   Salem District.                                           ... Respondent(s)
                   [Crime No.78 of 2026]

                   PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023,
                   to enlarge the petitioner on bail concerned in Crime No.78 of 2026 pending on
                   the file of the respondent police.



                                    For Petitioner(s)          : Mr.N.U.Pressanna

                                    For Respondent(s)          : Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar
                                                                 Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

                                                             ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on

22.02.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 75 of BNS, 2026 and Section 4

of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.78 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police,

seeks bail.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is aged 60 years; that

the petitioner had misbehaved with the defacto complainant by inappropriately

touching her private parts. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner

is innocent and he has been under incarceration since 22.02.2026. The allegation

against the petitioner is that under the guise of doing some ritual act, he has

touched the defacto complainant’s chest and that the age of the petitioner is 60

years.

4. The learned Government Advocate would oppose the bail application

and submit that the investigation is in the advanced stage.

5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the

learned counsel on either side.

6. Taking into consideration of the totality of the circumstances and upon

the fact that the petitioner is aged 60 years, this Court is inclined to enlarge him

on bail with certain stringent conditions:

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his

executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis only), with two sureties each for a like sum, to the satisfaction of the District

Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Vazhapadi, subject to the following conditions:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[e] on breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions had been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court itself, as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[f] if the petitioner thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR may be registered under Section 269 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

10.04.2026

ata

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Note:

1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court.

2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code.

To

1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Vazhapadi.

2. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Salem.

3. The Sub Inspector of Police, Valapady Police Station, Salem District.

4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.KUMARAPPAN,J.

ata

10.04.2026

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter