Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rep. By Its Director vs The Commissioner Of Service Tax
2025 Latest Caselaw 7357 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7357 Mad
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2025

Madras High Court

Rep. By Its Director vs The Commissioner Of Service Tax on 22 September, 2025

Bench: S.M.Subramaniam, Mohammed Shaffiq
                                                                                        W.A.No.2756 of 2025
                                                                                       ----------------------------
                                  THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
                                               DATED: 22.09.2025
                                                        CORAM:
                            THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
                                              AND
                           THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ

                                            W.A.No. 2756 of 2025
                                                    and
                                           C.M.P.No.22152 of 2025


                M/s.Urmilla Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.,
                No.4-A, “Urmilla House”, 15, ARK Colony,
                Eldams Road, Alwarpet,
                Chennai – 600 018.

                Rep. by its Director
                Mr.Niraj Set, Having address at
                No.1A, Sri Ranjini Apartments,
                No.12, Subbaraya Avenue,
                Abiramapram,
                Chennai – 600 018.                                                     ...Appellant


                                                             Vs.


                1.The Commissioner of Service Tax,
                  Plot No.2504, “Newry Towers”, I Block,
                  12th Main Road, II Avenue,
                  Anna Nagar, Chennai – 40.

                2.Principal Commissioner of Central Excise & GST,
                  Chennai North Commissionerate,
                  No.26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road,
                  Chennai – 600 034.                                                  ...Respondents




                1/4


https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 02:32:36 pm )
                                                                                               W.A.No.2756 of 2025
                                                                                              ----------------------------
                PRAYER: The Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying
                to allow the Writ Appeal and set aside the order made in W.P.No.9607 of 2022
                dated 21.11.2024.

                                    For Appellant          : Mr.Senguttuvan K and
                                                             Mr.Venkateshwara Perumal


                                                                    *****
                                                             JUDGMENT

(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.)

The common order passed in the Writ Petition is the subject matter of

the present Writ Appeal.

2. The writ Court has elaborately considered the arguments advanced

by the appellant/ Writ Petitioner and relegated the parties to approach the

appellate Authority, since the order challenged is the order-in-original passed

by the Authority. Exhausting the alternate remedy under the statute is of

paramount importance and the disputed facts are to be adjudicated in the

manner known to law. The High Court in exercise of power of judicial review

cannot adjudicate such disputed issues, which requires scrutinization of

documents in original and records.

3. In view of the fact that the learned Single Judge relegated the

appellant to approach the appellate Authority under the provisions of the Act,

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 02:32:36 pm )

----------------------------

this Court do not find any infirmity. Consequently, the writ appeal stands

dismissed. The appellant is at liberty to file an appeal within a period of thirty

days from today. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous

petition is closed.





                                                                             (S.M.S., J.)   (M.S.Q., J.)
                                                                                    22.09.2025
                dsa
                Index            :Yes/No
                Neutral Citation :Yes/No
                Speaking/Non-speaking order



                To

1.The Commissioner of Service Tax, Plot No.2504, “Newry Towers”, I Block, 12th Main Road, II Avenue, Anna Nagar, Chennai – 40.

2.Principal Commissioner of Central Excise & GST, Chennai North Commissionerate, No.26/1, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai – 600 034.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 02:32:36 pm )

----------------------------

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

and MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.

dsa

22.09.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 02:32:36 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter