Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd vs Meherunisa
2025 Latest Caselaw 7274 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7274 Mad
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2025

Madras High Court

Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd vs Meherunisa on 19 September, 2025

Author: G.Jayachandran
Bench: G.Jayachandran
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 19.09.2025

                                                          CORAM:

                                   THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
                                                       and
                                    THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                                              C.M.P.No.22753 of 2025
                                                        in
                                              A.S.SR.No.87634 of 2024

                     Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd
                     Having Registered Office at
                     223, Mint Street, Chennai 600 003
                     and a branch office at
                     73 @ 74 Arcot Road,
                     Kodampakkam,
                     Chennai 600 024                                       .. Petitioners / Appellant
                                                               Vs.
                     1.Meherunisa
                     2.Zakiamma
                     3.Mehebunissa
                     4.Farhana
                     5.Abdul Khuddose
                     6.Rehana
                     7.M.Atahur Rahaman
                     8.M.Ameenur Rahman                                   .. Respondents / Respondents
                     PRAYER: Appeal Suit is filed under Order 41 Rule 3(A) of C.P.C, to
                     condone the delay 6148 days in filing the appeal order dated 11-06-2007
                     made in I.A.No.18502 of 2005 in O.S.No.7759 of 1997 on the file of the IV
                     Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.


                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 22/09/2025 06:42:00 pm )
                                             For Petitioner             : Mr.S.Santhosh Kumar

                                                           ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN., J.]

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the Managing

Director of M/s. Park Town Benefit Fund Limited, seeking to condone the

delay of 6148 days in filing an appeal against the final decree dated

11.06.2007 in O.S.No.7759 of 1997 on the file of the IV Additional City

Civil Court, Chennai.

2. The above suit filed by the respondents for permanent injunction

and redemption of mortgage against the petitioner herein, who is a benefit

fund/financial institution. It appears that apprehending sale of the mortgage

property, the respondent has filed the suit, contending that a substantial

portion of the loan amount had already been paid and only a sum of

Rs.5,65,707.87 remained outstanding. Despite the respondents willingness

to deposit the said amount, the petitioner proceeded to bring the property for

sale.

3. The petitioner filed a written statement, disputing the claim and

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/09/2025 06:42:00 pm ) raised certain contentions. However, the matter did not progressed further,

which has led to the passing of a preliminary decree on 15.12.2000, followed

by the final decree on 11.06.2007.

4. It is the contention of the petitioner that due to seizure of

management by a Government-appointed official (a retired Inspector

General of Registration) and due to shifting of records from one branch to

another, they were unable to follow up the case. The petitioner claims that

the judgment and decree came to their notice only during a routine

inspection and if the delay is not condoned and the ex parte decree not

interfered, the petitioner company will be put to grave prejudice and

financial loss.

5. It is a well settled principle of law that delay in filing an appeal

should be explained with sufficient and satisfactory reasons. In the present

case, the petitioner has filed a petition seeking condonation of delay of 6148

days, which is nearly about 17 years. However, the petitioner had not

furnished any details as to what prevented them for contesting the suit after

having filed the written statement. While a preliminary decree passed on

15.12.2000 and the final decree passed on 11.06.2007, the present petition to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/09/2025 06:42:00 pm ) set aside the ex parte decree, along with the petition for condonation of delay

has been filed only on 09.07.2024.

6. The affidavit filed in support of the petition is bereft of details

to substantiate and satisfy the reason for delay. Hence, this Court is not

inclined to condone the enormous delay which is not been properly and

satisfactorily explained.

7. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed.

Consequently, the Appeal is rejected at the SR stage itself. No costs.

[Dr.G.J., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 19.09.2025 rpl

To

The IV Additional City Civil Court, Chennai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/09/2025 06:42:00 pm ) Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN., J.

and M.JOTHIRAMAN., J.

rpl

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/09/2025 06:42:00 pm )

in

19.09.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 22/09/2025 06:42:00 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter