Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lakshmanan vs The District Registrar
2025 Latest Caselaw 7175 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7175 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 September, 2025

Madras High Court

Lakshmanan vs The District Registrar on 17 September, 2025

Author: Krishnan Ramasamy
Bench: Krishnan Ramasamy
                                                                                      W.P.No.35043 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED : 17.09.2025

                                                           CORAM

                              The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

                                          Writ Petition No.35043 of 2025
                                                        and
                                         WMP.Nos.39202 and 39205 of 2025

                     Lakshmanan
                                                                                           ...Petitioner
                                                               Vs.
                     1. The District Registrar,
                     (Administration),
                     Office of The District Registrar,
                     Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

                     2.The Sub Registrar,
                     Office Of The Sub Registrar, Vanur,
                     Villupuram District.

                     3.The Superintendent Of Police,
                     Villupuram District.

                     4.The Inspector Of Police,
                     Auroville Police Station,
                     Thiruchirampalam,
                     Vanur Taluk,
                     Villupuram District.

                     5.The Auroville Foundation,
                     Rep. by its Secretary,
                     Auroville,

                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 06:58:38 pm )
                                                                                             W.P.No.35043 of 2025

                     Villupuram District.

                     6.Pachaiyappan

                     7.Kumar

                                                                                               ... Respondents

                                  Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for
                     issuance of Writ of            Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records
                     pertaining to the impugned order dated 27.03.2023 in Na.Ka.No. 5146/ A3/
                     2022 passed by the 1st Respondent District Registrar (Administration),
                     Tindivanam quash the same and consequently that the 1st respondent has no
                     jurisdiction to annul or cancel a registered settlement deed dated 25.7.1990
                     particularly in the face of a binding civil court decree.


                                        For Petitioner              :    Mr.D.Edwin Yuvan Raj
                                        For Respondents             :    Mr.Abishek Murthy
                                                                         Government Advocate (R1 and R2)
                                                                        Mr.L.Baskaran (Crl.side) (R3 and R4)
                                                                        Government Advocate

                                                                 ***
                                                                ORDER

Mr.Abishek Murthy, learned Government Advocate takes notice on

behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. Mr.L.Baskaran (Crl.side), learned

Government Advocate (Crl.side) taes notice on behalf of the respondents 3

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 06:58:38 pm )

and 4.

2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 27.03.2023

passed by the 1st respondent, cancelling the Settlement Deed dated

25.07.1990 and to quash the same.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the 1st

respondent has no authority to cancel or nullify the Settlement Deed,

especially in the face of decree of a competent civil Court. Further, he

would submit that Division Bench of this Court in a batch of cases vide

Judgment dated 02.08.2024 in W.P.No.10291 of 2022, etc., batch has held

that Section 77A of the Registration Act is unconstitutional and it has no

retrospective effect and the registering authority has no power to cancel or

invalidate the documents already registered and relegated the parties to the

Civil Court. Therefore, by virtue of the aforesaid Judgment, the impugned

order passed by the 1st respondent is liable to be quashed.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents1

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 06:58:38 pm )

and 2 also accepted the said contention and prayed for appropriate orders.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel

appearing on either side and in view of the aforesaid Judgment of the

Division Bench of this Court dated 02.08.2024 in W.P.Nos.10291 of 2022,

etc., batch impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent is liable to be

quashed and accordingly the impugned order dated 17.02.2023 passed by

the 3rd respondent is quashed. However, the 3rd respondent-authority can

relegate the parties to Civil Court, if so advised.

6. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition is

disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions

are closed.


                                                                                               17.09.2025

                     Index                    : Yes / No
                     Neutral Citation         : Yes / No
                     Speaking Order           : Yes / No
                     arr









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                   ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 06:58:38 pm )





                     To

                     1. The District Registrar,
                     (Administration),
                     Office of The District Registrar,
                     Tindivanam, Villupuram District.

                     2.The Sub Registrar,
                     Office Of The Sub Registrar, Vanur,
                     Villupuram District.

                     3.The Superintendent Of Police,
                     Villupuram District.

                     4.The Inspector Of Police,
                     Auroville Police Station,
                     Thiruchirampalam,
                     Vanur Taluk,
                     Villupuram District.

                     5.The Auroville Foundation,
                     Rep. by its Secretary,
                     Auroville,
                     Villupuram District.









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 06:58:38 pm )


                                                                 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.

                                                                                             arr




                                                              Writ Petition No.35043 of 2025




                                                                                   17.09.2025








https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/09/2025 06:58:38 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter