Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Pappathi vs /
2025 Latest Caselaw 6928 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6928 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 September, 2025

Madras High Court

N.Pappathi vs / on 11 September, 2025

                                                                                       C.R.P.No.4320 of 2025

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                     Dated:11.09.2025

                                                             Coram:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN

                                        Civil Revision Petition No.4320 of 2025
                                                          and
                                               C.M.P.No.22150 of 2025

                     1.N.Pappathi,
                     Wife of Nagarajan
                     No.1/11, Mariamman Koil Street,
                     Kondalampatti, Salem Town,
                     Salem Taluk, Salem District.

                     2.S.Sambasivam,
                     Son of Samiyannan
                     No.1/17, Mariamman Koil Street,
                     Kondalampatti, Salem Town,
                     Salem Taluk, Salem District. ..Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants 3 & 4

                                                             /versus/

                     Nagammal(died)
                     Wife of Kasi
                     Eri Pudur Kattuvalavu,
                     Agraharam Natamangalam Post,
                     Vahapadi Taluk,
                     Salem District.




                     1/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )
                                                                                      C.R.P.No.4320 of 2025

                     1.R.Kasi,
                     Son of Ramar
                     Pandathakarar Vattam,
                     East Thiruvagoundanur,
                     Salem Taluk, Salem District,
                     Salem 636 005.

                     2.K.Arunagiri,
                     Son of Kasi,
                     Pandathakarar Vattam,
                     East Thiruvagoundanur,
                     Salem Taluk, Salem District,
                     Salem 636 005.

                     3.R.Dhanam,
                     Wife of Raja,
                     No.181, Tala Uthu Kadu,
                     Chettichavady,
                     Kannankurichi Post,
                     Salem Taluk, Salem District,
                     Salem 636 008.

                     4.TK.Elumalai,
                     Son of Kasi
                     Pandathakarar Vattam,
                     East Thiruvagoundanur,
                     Salem Taluk, Salem District,
                     Salem 636 005 .                    ..Respondents/Respondents/Plaintiffs

                     5.D.Pachiammal,
                     Wife of Duraisamy,
                     Eri Pudur Kattuvalavu,
                     Agraharam Natamangalam Post,
                     Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District.

                     2/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )
                                                                                       C.R.P.No.4320 of 2025


                     Natarajan(Died)
                     Son of Duraisamy
                     Eri Pudur Kattuvalavu,
                     Agraharam Natamangalam Post,
                     Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District.

                     6.N.Rajith,
                     Son of Natarajan,
                     Eri Pudur Kattuvalavu,
                     Agraharam Natamangalam Post,
                     Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District.

                     7.Nandhini,
                     Daughter of Natarajan,
                     Eri Pudur Kattuvalavu,
                     Agraharam Natamangalam Post,
                     Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District.

                     8.Mahesh,
                     Wife of Natarajan
                     Eri Pudur Kattuvalavu,
                     Agraharam Natamangalam Post,
                     Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District.             ..Respondents/Respondents/
                                                                        Defendants 1,2,5,6 and 7

                            Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the
                     Constitution of India to set aside the fair and decretal order dated
                     03.07.2025 in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.7 of 20218 on the file of the
                     District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vazhapadi only in respect of the
                     order of the trial Court that the petitioners shall be permitted to participate
                     and conduct the case from this stage of the case only.




                     3/8




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )
                                                                                             C.R.P.No.4320 of 2025


                                        For Petitioners        :Mr.K.Selvaraj
                                                                  ------

                                                                  ORDER

This petition has been filed to set aside the fair and decretal order

dated 03.07.2025 in I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.7 of 20218 on the file of

the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vazhapadi, only in respect of

the order of the trial Court that the petitioners shall be permitted to

participate and conduct the case from this stage of the case only.

2. The defendants 3 and 4 have preferred the petition. The suit is filed

for declaration and for recovery of possession. The revision petitioners are

the defendants 3 and 4 in the above suit. The aforesaid defendants 3 and 4

were set exparte for non-filing of the written statement on 04.01.2023. On

the side of the plaintiffs, PW-1 and PW-2 were examined and on the side of

the defendants, DW-1 was examined.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )

3. At this juncture, the defendants 3 and 4 have filed an application in

I.A.No.3 of 2025 in O.S.No.7 of 2018 to set aside the exparte order passed

against them dated 04.01.2023.

4. Upon hearing on either side, the Court below has allowed the

application in its order dated 03.07.2025. The Court below has also

observed that considering the stage of this case and age of the case, the

revision petitioners/defendants 3 and 4 shall be permitted to participate and

conduct the case from this stage of the case only to curtail the dragon of the

case by the revision petitioners/defendants 3 and 4.

5. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that

though the Court below has allowed the petition filed by the revision

petitioners, the condition imposed by the Court below is unsustainable

under law. When an exparte order is set aside, the defendants would be

regulated in his position as on date, when they were proceeded exparte

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )

decree and they shall be permitted to join the proceedings from that stage

and not from any prospective date. To strengthen his contention, the learned

counsel appearing for the revision petitioners has relied upon the judgment

of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arjun Singh v. Mohindra Kumar and

others reported in [AIR 1964 SC 993].

6. The only grievance of the petitioners is that the condition imposed

by the Court below has to be set aside, when an application is filed under

Order 9 Rule 7 of C.P.C. The proceedings are to be reflected and the

defendants should be permitted to go back to the date of the exparte order

and contest the case. If the Court below has not permitted the defendants to

defend the case from the date of the exparte order, even though it has set

side the exparte order and therefore, the order of the Court below is

contradictory and prejudicial to the rights of the revision petitioners.

7. In the interest of justice, this Court is inclined to set aside the order

of the Court below with regard to the condition imposed that the revision

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )

petitioners shall be permitted to participate and conduct the case from this

stage of the case only. Considering the stage and the age of the case, the

learned Court below shall dispose of the case in O.S.No.7 of 2018 as

expeditiously as possible.

8. With the above observations, this Civil Revision Petition is

disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is

closed.

11.09.2025

Index:yes/no Speaking order/non speaking order Neutral citation:yes/no ari

To

The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate,Vazhapadi.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )

M.JOTHIRAMAN,J.

ari

and

11.09.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 12/09/2025 08:53:00 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter