Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8217 Mad
Judgement Date : 30 October, 2025
CRP NO. 68 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30-10-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
CRP NO. 68 of 2025
Thilagavathi .... Petitioner
vs
1.Sarojini @ Lalitha Saraswathi
2.Thangaraji
3.A.Kuthalingam ... Respondents
Revision filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside
the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in S.No.196 of 2023 in unnumbered As
N.... of 2023 against O.S.No.7 of 2016 dated 15.10.2024 on the file of
Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri.
For Petitioner : Mr.Gowwtham Thelak V.B
For Respondents:Mr.V.Sakkarapani
For R.2
ORDER
The revision petition is at the instance of the plaintiff whose original
suit in O.S.No.7 of 2016 came to be dismissed on 22.07.2022. An appeal
was preferred along with an application to condone the delay of 248 days,
however, the said application in I.A.No.4 of 2023 came to be dismissed by
the learned Principal District Judge, Dharmapuri finding that the revision
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/11/2025 03:19:00 pm ) petitioner herein has not made out sufficient cause for condonation of delay.
2. Mr.Gowwtham Thelak V.B, learned counsel for the petitioner would
invite my attention to the fact that the suit in O.S.No.7 of 2016 was jointly
tried along with the suit filed by the respondents in this revision in
O.S.No.170 of 2014, and by common judgment, both the suits came to be
dismissed. As against the dismissal of the other suit, the respondents have
preferred an appeal in A.S.No.42 of 2022, which is pending before the
learned Additional District Court, Dharmapuri. In the light of the above, the
delay also not being inordinate and it is only a delay of 248 days in preferring
the appeal and in any event, when the appeal against the judgment in the
common suit is pending consideration in A.S.No.42 of 2022, no serious
prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the delay is condoned and
the petitioners are also permitted to challenge the common judgment in
O.S.No.7 of 2016.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents also fairly admitted to the
position that the connected appeal in A.S.No.42 of 2022 is pending.
4. In the light of the above, in order to do substantial justice to the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/11/2025 03:19:00 pm ) parties,I am inclined to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.4 of 2023 in
S.No.196 of 2023 in unnumbered A.S.No.... of 2023 and the delay of 248
days in preferring the appeal is condoned. The appeal shall be numbered and
posted before the learned Additional District Judge, Dharmapuri, to be heard
jointly along with A.S.No.42 of 2022. The learned Additional District Judge,
Dharmapuri shall expedite the hearing and dispose both the appeals on merits
and in accordance with law within a period of six months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this order.
5. With the above direction, the civil revision petition is allowed. No
costs.
30-10-2025
Index:yes/no Website:yes/no Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order sr
To
The Principal District Court, Dharmapuri
P.B.BALAJI.,J
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/11/2025 03:19:00 pm ) sr
30.10.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/11/2025 03:19:00 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!