Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7909 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 October, 2025
2025:MHC:2429
W.A.No.3133 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.10.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
W.A.No.3133 of 2025
and CMP.Nos.25430 and 25431 of 2025
M/s.Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited,
Rep. By its Assistant General Manager (HR),
Thiruchirapalli-620 014 ... Appellant
Vs.
K.Balu
... Respondent
PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, praying to
set aside the impugned order dated 20.08.2025 passed in W.P.No.27260 of
2025 and consequently, direct the appellant to engage the Legal
Practitioner/Advocate on their behalf in I.D.No.62 of 2013 pending on the
file of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court,
Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Nithianandam
JUDGMENT
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/10/2025 03:00:24 pm )
(Judgment of this Court was delivered by M.S.RAMESH.J)
This Writ Appeal has been filed to set aside the impugned order
dated 20.08.2025 passed in W.P.No.27260 of 2025 and consequently, direct
the appellant to engage the Legal Practitioner/Advocate on their behalf in
I.D.No.62 of 2013, pending on the file of the Central Government
Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Chennai.
2.Under Section 36(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), there is a bar for any of the parties to
the Industrial Dispute to engage a legal practitioner. Before the Writ Court,
the Management had claimed that the workman had given consent to them,
as required under Section 36(4) of the Act, for engaging a legal
practitioner. However, the document dated 31.07.2014 referred to by the
learned counsel for the Management, claiming it to be a consent, does not
reveal any such consent, but appears to be a simple receipt of Rs.10,000/-,
received on behalf of the Management.
3. In the absence of any explicit consent given by the workman and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/10/2025 03:00:24 pm )
in view of the specific bar under Section 36(3) of the Act, we do not find
any reason to interfere with the order of the Central Government Industrial
Tribunal dated 07.07.2025, as well as that of the learned Single Judge made
in W.P.No.27260 of 2025 dated 20.08.2025.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal stands dismissed. No Costs.
Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
[M.S.R., J] [R.S.V.,J]
16.10.2025
Index: Yes/No
Speaking/Non-speaking order
Neutral Citation: Yes/No
Anu
M.S.RAMESH, J.
and
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/10/2025 03:00:24 pm )
R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
Anu
and CMP.Nos.25430 and 25431 of 2025
16.10.2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/10/2025 03:00:24 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!