Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kamala Prasad vs Chennai Metropolitan Development
2025 Latest Caselaw 7568 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 7568 Mad
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2025

Madras High Court

Kamala Prasad vs Chennai Metropolitan Development on 6 October, 2025

                                                                                                       1




                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                DATED: 06-10-2025

                                                         CORAM

                       THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN

                                               WP No. 37113 of 2025



                1. Kamala Prasad
                S/o Late Mr. Bajrangala Kajaria,
                12 Diamonds, 11th Floor,
                46a Alipore, Po Alipore,
                Kolkata, West Bengal 700 027

                                                                                       Petitioner(s)

                                                              Vs

                Chennai Metropolitan Development
                Authority (CMDA)
                Rep By Its Member Secretary
                Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai,
                No 1 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore
                Chennai 600 008

                                                                                       Respondent(s)


                PRAYER
                Direct the Respondent to allow the Power Attorney Holder of the petitioner
                Mr.Ramesh Sarangadharrao Auradhkar, to receive the original copy of the Lease
                -cum sale agreement dated 08.03.1991 and also to allow the same power
                Attorney Holder to execute the Sale deed on behalf of the petitioner.



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )
                                                                                                   2




                                  For Petitioner(s):       M/s.K.S.Shankar Chakrapani
                                                           B. Mughundhan
                                                           Saravana Rajan S
                                                           M. Bharathidasan

                                  For Respondent:          Mr.V.Sudalai Selvam,
                                                           Standing Counsel

                                                             ORDER

The petitioner is a Dealer in Iron and Steel. He claims that he is running

a Sole Proprietorship under the name and style of "M/s.Hind Udyog

Corporation" having its Registered office at 93A, Titjala Road, Calcutta 700

2. It was a decision of the Government of Tamil Nadu to create a separate

market for dealers in iron and steel. This market was created in Sathangadu.

The petitioner was desirous of getting a plot in his favour. Accordingly, he

applied on 1.5.1987. His application was accepted and a Lease cum Sale

Agreement was entered into between the respondent and the petitioner on

8.3.1991. It is necessary to point out, at this stage, that the petitioner had

entered into a Lease cum Sale Agreement on 8.3.1991 through his Power of

Attorney Holder Sri.Rameshwar Prasad Joshi. Even at that time, the petitioner

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

was residing at 32, Armenian Street, Calcutta. Under the Lease cum Sale

Agreement, the petitioner was allotted a plot bearing No.D-411.

3. In terms of the Lease cum Sale Agreement, the petitioner had paid all

the amounts due to the respondent. This is evidenced from the "No Due

Certificate" dated 30.11.2012 issued by the CMDA. The petitioner has also

secured renewal of licence from the Market Management Committee in terms of

the Tamil Nadu Specified Commodities Markets (Regulation of Location) Act,

1996.

4. Having complied with the requirements of the Lease cum Sale

Agreement, the petitioner had sent a representation on 26.7.2025 calling upon

the respondent to hand over the original copy of the Lease cum Sale Agreement

dated 8.3.1991 and also to allow his Power of Attorney Agent to complete the

sale transaction. Though the representation was received, there was no response

from the respondent. Hence, the petitioner has come forward with the present

writ petition.

5. I have heard Mr.K.S.Shankar Chakrapani, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mr.V.Sudalai Selvam, learned Standing Counsel for the

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

respondent.

6. I have gone through the records.

7. As the facts have already been narrated, I do not find that reiteration of

the same in this portion of the judgment is necessary.

8. A perusal of the papers reveals that the petitioner is aged about 85

years. He has executed a Deed of Special Power of Attorney on 22.8.2025 in

favour of one Ramesh Sarangdharrao Auradkar. The said Power of Attorney is

also registered on the file of the Sub Registrar III, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar

bearing Document Serial No.Chhasan 3-9800-2025. The said Power of

Attorney authorises the following acts:-

"1) To submit the agreement to sale and sale deeds,

lease deeds, mortgage deed, hypothecation deed,

personal guarantee, consent deed, gift deed correction

deed and other related documents executed by the

Executant, either for purchase, sale lease or

hypothecation of immovable properties, to the

Registering Authority for the purpose of registration

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

and give admission of the execution.

2) To do all other acts and deeds which are necessary

and essential to complete the registration of the

agreement to sale, sale deeds, lease deeds, mortgage

deed, hypothecation deed, personal guarantee, consent

deed, gift deed and other related documents either in

favour of Executant or by the Executant in favour of

Third Party.

3) All above acts and deeds if done by his Attorney

Holder will be deemed to have been done by the

Executant and will be binding on the Executant.

4) AND WHEREAS, The Attorney Holder has no rights

to the accepting consideration amount."

9. The reason for the CMDA not to execute the sale deed in favour of the

writ petitioner through the Power of Attorney seems to be the interpretation of

clause 13 of the Lease cum Sale Agreement. The said clause reads hereunder:-

"13. Transfer of Title:

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

(a) Transfer of title of shops shall be only with the concurrence

of the Authority. Sale deed will be issued to the allottee/only to

a person in the same trade.

(b) In case the Lessee Purchaser herein dies after possession

from the Vendor, the Vendor may transfer the benefit of this

agreement in favour of the legal heir of the Lessee Purchaser

on obtaining proof of heirship and necessary documents for the

recognition of such heir."

10. A perusal of the above clause shows that the title of the shop cannot

be transferred by the allottee in favour of any other person without prior

permission of the CMDA and even if permission was granted, it can be only in

favour of any person, who is dealing in the same trade. This clause does not bar

the power of attorney of the allottee to get a sale deed in favour of his principal.

11. The petitioner, being an octogenarian, cannot be called upon to come

all the way from Aurangabad, where he is currently residing, to get the sale deed

executed in his favour. The petitioner has also averred that on account of

various medical ailments and his advanced age, he is unable to travel to

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

Chennai. It is, therefore, he has executed a Deed of Special Power of Attorney.

It is only for the purpose of completing the transaction between himself and the

CMDA.

12. The purpose of executing a power of attorney is to complete the

transaction that is entered into between the principal and the respondent. The

power of attorney also reads that the principal accepts that the acts done by his

Power Holder, will be deemed to have been done by the Executant and will be

binding on him. It is not as if there is a transfer of title from the petitioner to the

power agent. The sale deed entered between the CMDA and the petitioner is

going to be completed through the power agent. Title is going to vest only with

the writ petitioner and not with the power agent. Hence, I am of the view that

the reluctance on the part of the CMDA in the aforesaid circumstances is

unwarranted. Consequently, the writ petition is ordered with the following

directions:-

i) CMDA shall verify the original of the power of attorney executed by

the petitioner in favour of Shri.Ramesh Sarangadharrao Auradhkar.

ii) On being satisfied with the execution of the power of attorney deed, it

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

shall complete the transaction that has been initiated by the petitioner on

8.3.1991.

iii) The petitioner shall, obviously, bear the registration and stamp charges

for the purpose of completing the transaction.

iv) Such exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from

today.

v) There shall be no order as to costs.

06-10-2025

ssk Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

To

Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) Rep By Its Member Secretary Thalamuthu Natarajan Maaligai, No 1 Gandhi Irwin Road, Egmore Chennai 600 008

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN J.

ssk

06-10-2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 10/10/2025 11:42:39 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter