Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 8510 Mad
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2025
SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 11-11-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009 & M.P.No.1 of 2009
1. V.Markandan
S/o. Varadappa Naidu, Othaivadai
Street, Ayarpadi Village And Post,
Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore Dist.
2.V.Pazhani
S/o. Vadivel Naicker, Road Street,
Ayarpadi Village And Post, Arakkonam
Taluk, Vellore Dist
Appellant(s) in both appeals
Vs
1. LAKSHMI
W/o. Perumal Naicker, 54, East Raja
Street, Big Kancheepuram And Post,
Kancheepuram.
2.BOOPATHI
S/o. Chandran, 54, East Raja Street,
Big Kancheepuram And Post,
Kancheepuram.
3.SELVI
W/o. Ramalingam, 54/a, East Raja
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 02:33:03 pm )
SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009
Street, Kancheepuram Dist.
4.SHANKAR
S/o. Perumal Naicker, 54/a, East Raja
Street, Kancheepuram Dist.
5.SHANTHA
S/o. Perumal Naicker, 54/a, East Raja
Street, Kancheepuram Dist.
Respondent(s) in S.A.No.164 of 2009
1. LAKSHMI, W/o.Perumal Naicker
2.SHANKAR, S/o. Perumal Naicker
All are residing at 54/A, East Raja Street,
Big Kancheepuram, Kancheepuram.
Respondent[s] in S.A.No.165 of 2009
PRAYER : Appeals filed under 100 of Code of Civil Procedure against the
judgment and decree dated 10.04.2008 made in A.S.Nos.40 and 41 of 2007 on
the file of the Subordinate Court, Ranipet, confirming the judgment and decree
dated 29.12.2006 made in O.S.Nos.102 of 1999 and 158 of 2002 on the file of
the District Munsif Court, Sholinghur.
For Appellant(s): No Appearance [in both appeals]
For Respondent(s): No Appearance [in both appeals]
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 02:33:03 pm )
SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009
ORDER
These Second Appeals have been filed challenging the judgment and
decree dated 10.04.2008 made in A.S.Nos.40 and 41 of 2007 on the file of the
Subordinate Court, Ranipet, confirming the judgment and decree dated
29.12.2006 made in O.S.Nos.102 of 1999 and 158 of 2002 on the file of the
District Munsif Court, Sholinghur.
2. When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation for both
sides. In the earlier occasion, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants
reported no instructions and the notice issued from the registry is of no use,
despite the same has been served on the second appellant. Hence, these Second
Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected
miscellaneous petition is closed.
11-11-2025
Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No vrc
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 02:33:03 pm ) SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009
To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Ranipet.
2. The District Munsif, Sholinghur.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 02:33:03 pm ) SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009
Dr.R.N.MANJULA, J.
vrc
SA Nos. 164 & 165 of 2009
11-11-2025
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 14/11/2025 02:33:03 pm )
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!