Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

R.Nagamani vs The Registrar
2025 Latest Caselaw 4464 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4464 Mad
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2025

Madras High Court

R.Nagamani vs The Registrar on 27 March, 2025

Author: Battu Devanand
Bench: Battu Devanand
                                                                                     W.P.(MD) No.22250 of 2023


                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                              DATED : 27.03.2025

                                                      CORAM:

                              THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

                                         W.P.(MD)No.22250 of 2023
                                      and W.M.P(MD)No. 18522 of 2023
                     R.Nagamani                                                        ... Petitioner
                                                            Vs.
                     1.The Registrar,
                     Kamaraj University,
                     Palkalai Nagar,
                     Madurai – 625 021

                     2.The Director,
                     Educational Multimedia Research Centre,
                     Kamaraj University,
                     Palakalai Nagar,
                     Madurai – 625 021

                     3.The Deputy Director of Local Fund Audit,
                     Kamaraj University,
                     Palkalai Nagar,
                     Madurai – 625 021                                                  ... Respondents


                     PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
                     praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the
                     records pertaining to the impugned letter in Ref.No.EMRC/MKU/
                     ADMN/PEN/2023-2024 dated 09.08.2023 issued by the second
                     respondent in so far recovery of Rs.4,81,573/- (Rs.4,08,073/- (excess
                     pay) + Rs.73,500/- (Income tax) is concerned and quash the same as
                     ___________
                     Page 1 of 9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis            ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )
                                                                                            W.P.(MD) No.22250 of 2023


                     illegal and consequently direct the respondents to refund the recovered
                     amount of Rs.4,81,573/- to the petitioner, within the period that may be
                     stipulated by this Court.


                                       For Petitioner            : Mr.K.Ponnaiah

                                       For R1 & R2              : Mr.T.Cibi Chakaraborthy

                                       For R3                   : Mr.M.Siddharthan
                                                                  Additional Government Pleader


                                                             ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed to quash the impugned letter

dated 09.08.2023 issued by the second respondent so far as the recovery

of Rs.4,81,573/- (Rs.4,08,073/- (excess pay) + Rs.73,500/- (Income tax)

is concerned and for consequential direction to the respondents to refund

the recovered amount of Rs.4,81,573/- to the petitioner, within a

stipulated time to be fixed by this Court.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and the learned Additional

Government Pleader appearing for the third respondent sand carefully

examined the materials available on record.

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

3. The petitioner is the wife of one Dr.K.Govindan, who served as

Coordinator in Educational Multimedia Research Centre of Madurai

Kamaraj University from 11.08.1987. He was permitted to retire from

service on 28.02.2006 on attaining the age of age of 58 years. The

petitioner's husband died on 11.05.2021. Thereafter, the petitioner is

receiving family pension from the first respondent University after his

death.

4. It is the case of the petitioner that her husband initially joined as

Lecturer/Assistant Professor in Madurai in Yadava College, Madurai on

03.09.1976 and served upto 10.08.1987 for a period of ten years 11

months and 8 days. Thereafter, he was appointed as Lecturer in the first

respondent University on 10.08.1987 and was permitted to retire with

effect from 28.02.2006. The petitioner's husband challenged the order of

retirement on 27.02.2006 in WP(MD)No.2166 of 2006 before this Court

on the ground that he was a non-vacation academician and therefore

sought retirement on attaining the age of 60 years. The said writ petition

was allowed by this Court by order dated 08.04.2011 with a direction to

the first respondent University to pay salary and consequential benefits

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

for the post of of Co-ordinator and Head of the Educational Multi Media

Centre to the petitioner until he reached the age of 60 years within a

period of six weeks. The first respondent had not disbursed the

pensionary benefits entitled to him from the day one of his retirement

until the order dated 08.04.2011 of this Court. After notice is served in

Contempt Petition, the first respondent preferred an appeal in

WA(MD)No.201 of 2012 and the same was dismissed by the Division

Bench on 21.12.2023.

5. Thereafter, the petitioner's husband was granted pensionary

benefits and subsequently he expired on 11.05.2021 and thereafter the

petitioner was receiving family pension. On 09.08.2023, the second

respondent vide letter dated 09.08.2023, informed the petitioner that out

of Rs.11,14,798/- the amount payable to the petitioner as arrears of pay,

after deducting Rs.4,08,073/- towards excess payment made to the

petitioners husband, they disbursed an amount of Rs.6,33,225/- to the

petitioner.

6. The petitioner submitted a representation dated 12.08.2023 to

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

the respondents requesting to furnish particulars to come to an opinion

by them with respect to the excess payment made to the petitioner's

husband. He made another representation dated 15.08.2023 to refund a

sum of Rs.4,08,073/- + Rs.73,500/- for Income Tax payable at 4,47,573/-,

as the said amount was recovered unilaterally and arbitrarily without

following due process of law. Against the inaction of the respondents 1

and 2 in refunding the said amount, the petitioner is constrained to file

this writ petition.

7. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the

order impugned in this writ petition is issued without putting the

petitioner on notice and no opportunity was provided to the petitioner

before deducting the said amount out of the amount payable to the

petitioner. The learned counsel further contends that as per the settled

law, the recovery should not be permissible from the retired employees or

the employees going to be retired within one year.

8. In the present case, admittedly, the petitioner's husband retired

on 28.02.2006. But later as per the order of this Court in WP(MD)No.

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

2166 of 2006, he was allowed to continue till 28.02.2008. The husband

of the petitioner also expired on 11.05.2021. After fifteen years of the

retirement of the petitioner's husband and after two years of his death,

now the second respondent recovered an amount of Rs.4,08,073/- from

and out of the amount of Rs.11,14,798/-, which has to be paid to the

petitioner towards arrears of pay, on the ground that excess payment was

made to the petitioner's husband.

9. In the order impugned in this writ petition issued by the second

respondent on 09.08.2023, there is no mention about issuance of notice

before making that recovery. Under these circumstances, this Court has

no hesitation to hold that the second respondent high-handedly deducted

an amount of Rs.4,08,073/- out of the amount to be paid to the petitioner

towards arrears of pay.

10. The learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of

this Court to the judgment of the Apex Court in Rafiq Masih (White

Washer) reported in 2015 (1) MPHT 130 (SC), wherein it is held that

recovery from retired employees or employees, who are going to retire

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

within one year, is impermissible in law. The judgment of the Apex Court

is squarely applicable to the facts of the present case.

11. For the reasons stated above, this writ petition is allowed with

the following directions:

i)the impugned letter dated 09.08.2023 issued by the second

respondent is hereby quashed.

ii)The second respondent is directed to refund an amount of

Rs.4,08,073/- with interest at the rate of 6% from the date of deduction

till the date of refund to the petitioner.

iii)The second respondent shall refund the said amount with

interest within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

27.03.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

Internet : Yes CM

To The Deputy Director of Local Fund Audit, Kamaraj University, Palkalai Nagar, Madurai – 625 021

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

BATTU DEVANAND, J.

CM

and W.M.P(MD)No.18522 of 2023

Dated : 27.03.2025

___________

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 03/04/2025 11:43:14 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter