Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Sampathkumar vs R.Rengasamy ...1St
2025 Latest Caselaw 4045 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4045 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2025

Madras High Court

N.Sampathkumar vs R.Rengasamy ...1St on 17 March, 2025

Author: R.Vijayakumar
Bench: R.Vijayakumar
                                                                                       C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025




                       BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

                                                DATED: 17.03.2025

                                                          CORAM

                                  THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR

                                         C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025
                                                     and
                                          C.M.P(MD)No.4347 of 2025


                N.Sampathkumar                        ...Petitioner/Claimant Petitioner/
                                                                   3rd Party/3rd Party

                                                    Vs.


                1.R.Rengasamy                       ...1st Respondent/1st Respondent/
                                                                 Petitioner/Plaintiff

                2.N.Natarajan                       ...2nd Respondent/2nd Respondent/
                                                                 Respondent/Defendant

                PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of
                India, to call for the records and set aside the fair and decreetal order dated
                06.11.2024 in E.A.No.04 of 2023 in E.A.No.03 of 2022 in E.P.No.383 of 2018
                in O.S.No.447 of 2016, on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Dindigul District,
                and allow this Civil Revision Petition.


                                     For Petitioner          : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar

                                                        *****



https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis              ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 04:29:15 pm )



                1/5
                                                                             C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025




                                                      ORDER

A third party to O.S.No.447 of 2016, on the file of the Principal Sub

Court, Dindigul, has filed the present revision petition, wherein his request for

amendment of his claim petition filed under Order 21 Rule 99 has been

dismissed.

2.The first respondent herein as plaintiff had filed the above said suit for

the relief of specific performance. The suit was decreed and the decree holder

has filed E.P.No.383 of 2018, for taking delivery of the property. At that stage,

the sons of the defendant had filed E.A.No.3 of 2022.

3.The claim petitioner claims that he is having 1/2 shares in the suit

schedule properties on the basis of registered partition deed of the year 2006.

When this application was pending, the claim petitioner has filed E.A.No.4 of

2023, seeking amendment of the claim petition to incorporate the prayer for

partition and to declare that the judgment and decree in O.S.No.447 if 2006 is

null and void. This amendment application has been dismissed. Challenging the

same, the present revision petition has been filed.

4.According to the learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner,

an application under Order 21 Rule 99 has to be treated as suit. In such

circumstances, when ultimately, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ifon:the ( Uploaded Court04:29:15 28/03/2025 arrives pm ) at a finding that the claim

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025

petitioner is one of the co-owners with the defendant, it would be appropriate to

pass a preliminary decree for partition and therefore, the claim petitioner has

filed such an amendment application to incorporate the prayer for partition. He

further contended that when the claim petition is pending, a suit would be bad

in view of the provisions of C.P.C.

5.I have considered the submissions made on either side and perused the

materials available on record.

6.According to the revision petitioner, he is having ½ share in the suit

schedule properties and therefore, his father should not have executed the sale

agreement in favour of the plaintiff for the whole of the property. The main

object of Section under Order 21 Rule 99, is to protect the possession of the

person on the basis of his right to be in possession. However, no consequential

orders can be passed. In such circumstances, this Court is of the considered

opinion that the amendment application to amend the claim petition including

the prayer for partition is not sustainable.

7.In case, if the Court arrives at a finding that the revision petitioner is

having ½ share over the suit schedule properties, it is always be open to the

revision petitioner to file a suit for partition.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 04:29:15 pm )

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025

8.With the above said observations, this Civil Revision Petition stands

disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also

closed.

17.03.2025

Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No RJR

To

The learned Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul District.

Copy to:-

The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 04:29:15 pm )

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025

R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J.

RJR

C.R.P.(PD)(MD)No.795 of 2025

17.03.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 28/03/2025 04:29:15 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter