Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pushparaj vs The Secretary To Government
2025 Latest Caselaw 4977 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4977 Mad
Judgement Date : 17 June, 2025

Madras High Court

Pushparaj vs The Secretary To Government on 17 June, 2025

Author: R.Subramanian
Bench: R.Subramanian
                                                                                            W.A.No.1740 of 2025


                                   THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 17.06.2025

                                                          CORAM:

                                  THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
                                                   AND
                                   THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDER

                                                 W.A.No.1740 of 2025

                     Pushparaj,
                     W/o.Late Kannan,
                     Formerly Maternity Assistant
                     (Multispeciality Health Worker, Supergrade),
                     Thirusuzhi Panchayat Union Dispensary
                     M.Reddipatti, Virudhunagar.          ...                         Appellant

                                                            versus

                     1.The Secretary to Government,
                       Rural Development & Panchayat
                        Raj Department,
                       Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.

                     2.The Secretary to Government,
                       Health & Family Welfare Department,
                       Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.

                     3.The Director of Rural Development
                       Panagal Building,
                       Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

                     4. The Director of Local Fund Audit,
                       Combined Accounts Office,
                       Anbalagan Maaligai, 4th Floor,
                       Nandanam,
                       Chennai - 600 035.

                     5.The Commissioner,
                     1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:07 am )
                                                                                                            W.A.No.1740 of 2025


                        Thirusuzhi Panchayat Union Office
                        M.Reddipatti,
                        Virudhunagar District.            ...                                       Respondents

                     Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, to set aside
                     the order passed in W.P.No.6896 of 2024 dated 28.03.2025.


                                  For Appellant      :         Mr.K.Venkataramani
                                                               Senior Counsel
                                                               for Mr.M.Muthappan

                                  For Respondents :            Mr.T.Chandrasekar
                                                               Special Government Pleader


                                                         JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)

Challenge in the Writ Petition was to the order of the fifth respondent

directing recovery of a sum of Rs.5,80,393/- which was wrongly paid to her

as a result of wrong fixation of her pay.

2. We heard Mr.K.Venkataramani, learned Senior Counsel,

instructed by Mr.M.Muthappan appearing for the appellant and

Mr.T.Chandrasekar, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the

respondents.

3. The Writ Court had held that the re-fixation is correct as the

salary of the appellant was wrongly fixed in the post of maternity assistant

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:07 am )

even though the appellant was only auxiliary mid wife. As far as recovery is

concerned the writ court after referring to the judgment of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in State of Punjab Vs. Rafiq Masih reported in (2015) 4

SCC 334 [whitewasher's case], wherein the Hon’ble Supreme Court had

held that excess payment made owing to the wrong fixation of pay scale by

the Department cannot be recovered from the pensioner and therefore the

recovery is impressible in law held that the appellant cannot rely upon the

said judgment as she had given an undertaking when her pension was fixed.

We are unable to sustain the said conclusion of the writ court since it

overlooks the bargaining power of a retired employee vis a vis the mighty

employer namely the state. The fact that the recovery in the case on hand is

due to the wrong fixation of the pay by the Department is not in dispute.

Therefore, the order of recovery has to be set aside.

4. Law on the question of recovery is settled by the judgment of

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in White Washer’s case, referred to supra. The

order of the recovery having been made after retirement, the same cannot be

sustained. At the same time, the re-fixation of the pension cannot be

questioned, inasmuch as it only rectifies the mistake committed.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:07 am )

5. Hence, the Writ Appeal is partly allowed and the order of

recovery is set aside. It is made clear that the appellant would be entitled to

pension as per the re-fixation done by the order dated 08.11.2010. No costs.

                                                                                     (R.S.M., J.)    (K.S., J.)
                                                                                           17.06.2025
                     Speaking order
                     Index                  :   No
                     Neutral Citation       :   No

                     sri









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                 ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:07 am )



                     To

                     1.The Secretary to Government,
                       Rural Development & Panchayat
                        Raj Department,
                       Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.

                     2.The Secretary to Government,
                       Health & Family Welfare Department,
                       Fort St.George, Chennai - 9.

                     3.The Director of Rural Development
                       Panagal Building,
                       Saidapet, Chennai - 600 015.

                     4. The Director of Local Fund Audit,
                       Combined Accounts Office,
                       Anbalagan Maaligai, 4th Floor,
                       Nandanam, Chennai - 600 035.

                     5.The Commissioner,
                       Thirusuzhi Panchayat Union Office
                       M.Reddipatti,
                       Virudhunagar District.









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:07 am )



                                                                            R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
                                                                                         and
                                                                                K.SURENDER, J.

                                                                                                    sri









                                                                                      17.06.2025









https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/06/2025 11:38:07 am )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter