Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Rajam Herbal Technologies vs G.Suresh
2025 Latest Caselaw 982 Mad

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 982 Mad
Judgement Date : 16 July, 2025

Madras High Court

Rajam Herbal Technologies vs G.Suresh on 16 July, 2025

Author: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
Bench: Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy
                                                                                      C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

                                                  DATED: 16.07.2025

                                                           CORAM

                 THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

                                          C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

                1. Rajam Herbal Technologies,
                   Rep. by its Partner Mrs.R.Aarthi,
                   No.3/368, Periya Mariyamman Kovil Street, Sithanur,
                   Thalavaipatty Post, Salem-636 302, Tamil Nadu, India.

                2. R.Sivagamasundari
                   Trading as M/s. Aarthi Agro Foods,
                   46/4b, Pethampatty Village, Veerapandi Block, Attyampatty,
                   S Palam Bus Stop, Salem-637 501, Tamil Nadu, India                                 ...Plaintiffs

                                                               Vs.

                1. G.Suresh,
                   Proprietor, Jayam Rajam Sukku Coffee Herbal,
                   No.98, Narayanan Street, Shevapet,
                   Salem - 636002, Tamil Nadu, India.

                2. K.Shanmuganathan & Co.,
                   262, Avvai Shanmugam Salai,
                   Gopalapuram, Chennai-600 086, Tamil Nadu, India.                                ...Defendants

                PRAYER: Plaint filed under Order VII Rule 1 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908
                read with Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules, 1956 read with Sections 27, 28,
                29, 134 & 135 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Sections 51, 55 & 62 of the

                1/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis             ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:50:31 pm )
                                                                                             C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

                Copyright Act, 1957, praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to grant a
                judgment and decree on the following terms:-
                          (a) A permanent injunction restraining Defendants, all their principal
                officers,         staff,   men,   agent,      servants,        successors,   assigns      in   business,
                representatives and any other person from infringing the trade mark by using the
                mark “JAYAM RAJAM SUKKU KAPPI MIX” or any other word/words/device
                that are identical or deceptively similar to the said registered trade mark
                “RAJAM”/”RAJAM SUKKU KAAPI” of the plaintiffs in class 30 in respect of
                coffee powder and instant mix and thereby restraining them from claiming any
                right through or under Defendants from in any manner infringing the registered
                trade marks by using trade mark “RAJAM”/ “RAJAM SUKKU KAAPI”.
                          (b) A permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, all his principal
                officers,         staff,   men,   agent,      servants,        successors,   assigns      in   business,
                representatives and any other person from passing off their goods by using the
                impugned trade mark “logo image-Jayam Rajam Sukku Kappi Mix”, which is
                deceptively similar as registered trade mark “logo image-Rajam” of the plaintiffs
                in class 30, or any other word/words/logo/artistic work/design/device that are
                identical or deceptively similar to the said registered trade mark of the plaintiffs
                in class 30 in respect of coffee powder and instant mix, and thereby restraining the
                Defendants in any manner from passing off.
                          (c) A permanent injunction restraining the defendants, all their principal
                officers,         staff,   men,   agent,      servants,        successors,   assigns      in   business,
                representatives and any other person from infringing the copyright of the plaintiffs
                by using the artistic work, trade dress and colour combination which are identical

                2/6




https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis                    ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:50:31 pm )
                                                                                             C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

                and deceptively similar to that of the plaintiffs' artistic works, colour combination,
                and trade dress; or any other logo/artistic work/design/device/trade dress that are
                identical or deceptively similar to the said copyright of the Plaintiffs.
                          (d) That the Defendants be ordered and directed to pay to Plaintiffs a sum of
                Rs.5,00,000/- (Five Lakhs only) by way of damages.
                          (e) A preliminary decree be passed in favour of the Plaintiffs directing the
                Defendants to render a true and faithful accounts of all profit made by them, using
                the plaintiffs' said trade mark and copyright and a final decree be passed in favour
                of the plaintiffs for the amount of profit thus found to have been made by the
                Defendants, together with interest, after the Defendants has rendered accounts.
                          (f) That the defendants be directed to deliver-up to the plaintiffs' for
                destruction, all labels, all other print materials, stickers, signage, visiting cards,
                letter heads, catalogues, pamphlets broachers all other advertising and promotional
                material, all stationery, and such other material used for passing off and violating
                plaintiff's trade mark.
                          (g) for the costs of the suit.

                                  For Plaintiffs          : Mr.Ramesh Ganapathy

                                  For Defendants          : Mr.T.K.Saravanan, for D1
                                                          : D2 – Served on 03.10.2024

                                                          JUDGMENT

The Suit was filed seeking remedies in respect of alleged infringement of

trademark, copyright and passing off.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:50:31 pm ) C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

2. The matter was referred to the Mediation Centre attached to this Court,

vide order dated 21.04.2025, and in course of mediation, the parties arrived at a

settlement and executed a joint compromise memo dated 27.06.2025. Such joint

compromise memo is annexed to report dated 02.07.2025 from the Mediation

Centre.

3. In the joint compromise memo, the 1st defendant has undertaken not to

use the Trademark 'RAJAM' or “RAJAM SUKKU KAPPI MIX' or any trademark,

which is deceptively similar thereto. The 1st defendant has also undertaken to pay a

sum of Rs.13,43,024/-(Rupees Thirteen Lakhs Forty Three Thousand and Twenty

Four only) to the plaintiffs within four (4) months from the date of signing of the

joint compromise memo, as per the schedule at Paragraph No.6 thereof.

4. Therefore, the parties have requested that a decree be issued in terms of

the joint compromise memo. I find that there is no legal impediment for the

issuance of a decree in terms of the above mentioned Joint Compromise Memo.

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:50:31 pm ) C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

5. In view of the above, C.S.(Comm.Div).No.164 of 2024 is decreed in

terms of the joint compromise memo dated 27.06.2025, which shall form an

integral part of the decree. In view of the settlement, there shall be no order as to

costs.

16.07.2025 (1/2) skt

Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case: Yes / No

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:50:31 pm ) C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J.

skt

C.S.(Comm.Div.).No.164 of 2024 (1/2)

16.07.2025

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 18/07/2025 07:50:31 pm )

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter